Laurent, if you've accomplished even the autocommit on save piece of this, I'd be interested in your notes. Your guys' ideas would go a very long way towards improving the experience in the browser. Thanks, Joel On Aug 29, 4:40 pm, laurent laffont <[hidden email]> wrote: > 2011/8/29 Göran Krampe <[hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > > On 08/29/2011 08:06 PM, laurent laffont wrote: > > >> After my lost work experience I don't want to live it again. > > >> I would like: > >> - save always do a commit category (then commit button is not necessary) > >> - on save / commit do a git commit on an alternative branch. > > >> The jtalk part seems easy. > > >> I cannot find how to trigger / run a system command / git when files are > >> written via webdav. Is it possible ? > > >> Maybe you have ideas on this. > > > Well, if you le me go a bit ambitious for a second, I talked with Stephan > > Eggermont quite a lot at ESUG and our ideas when it comes to handling source > > went something like this: > > > 1. Hook up to local storage (HTML5 API) and use that to log every "edit" > > just like a change log. I later realized that I want to port Delta to Jtalk > > and then we will have a really good model for this, and they can undo > > themselves! This enables both undo but also "git stash"-like functionality > > and also "commit grouping" etc etc. > > I've played a little with local storage yesterday to see if I can have a > sort of "recent changes" like but: > - local storage seems quite poor (cannot store objects, only primitive data > ...) > - is not cross-browser. Often I need to check stuff in several browsers - in > this case it seems nicer to have history on server side. > > As the jtalk application I'm developing will be integrated in a PHP project > (in a few days), I will try to write a jtalk - php - git toolchain. > > Laurent. > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Set up a public Riak server and some trivial functionality for doing an > > OAuth login. And then store our modules there, and of course see directly in > > the IDE what is available and be able to load with a single click etc etc. > > Issues like namespaces (I don't want them really, or something very simple) > > and dependencies etc - but we have a chance to do something simple that > > works. > > > I intend to write down my thoughts on the wiki for discussion etc. > > > regards, Göran |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Joel Turnbull <[hidden email]> wrote:
Sorry for late response. Autocommit should be easy to do - look at Browser code, commit handling code is there. Haven't tried it yet. Laurent. Thanks, |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |