Smalltalk › Gnu

Re: [bug] gst-remote and snapshots

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

MrGwen

Re: [bug] gst-remote and snapshots

Paolo Bonzini-3

Re: [bug] gst-remote and snapshots

Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/496
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/496

Project: GNU Smalltalk
Version: <none>
Component: Base classes
Category: bug reports
Priority: normal
Assigned to: Unassigned
Reported by: nico
Updated by: bonzinip
Status: active

(01:33:35 PM) bonzini: MrGwen: can you change it to check
#aboutToSnapshot and
resume on #finishedSnapshot instead?
(01:33:54 PM) MrGwen: I'll try
(01:34:36 PM) bonzini: MrGwen: also, perhaps change it to instance side
and use
r := Remote new.
(01:34:46 PM) bonzini: MrGwen: this way on #returnFromSnapshot you can
do
#removeDependent:
(01:35:19 PM) bonzini: MrGwen: long term we can move more parts of the
script into
the new class
(01:35:24 PM) bonzini: MrGwen: very good anyway, thanks!

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

MrGwen

Re: [bug] gst-remote and snapshots

Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/496
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/496

Project: GNU Smalltalk
Version: <none>
Component: Base classes
Category: bug reports
Priority: normal
Assigned to: Unassigned
Reported by: nico
Updated by: MrGwen
Status: active
Attachment: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/files/issues/Remote2.patch (2.43 KB)

I've made the following changes:
- everything is instance side
- in update : if #aboutToSnapshot then suspend the process, else if
#finishedSnapshot resume it and finally if it's #returnFromSnapshot
removeDependent.

I've tested it and seems ok

Gwen

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Paolo Bonzini-3