Re: c.l.s "Pharo less responsive than Squeak?"

Do you also see as these persons report it?

http://groups.google.com.br/group/comp.lang.smalltalk/browse_thread/thread/9f38eaa2a9c29213

--
Cesar Rabak

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

good to let us know.
I do not see pharo getting up to 130 Mb.


On Nov 26, 2009, at 9:53 PM, [hidden email] wrote:


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stef,

Beware Guido's report if for a Windows machine ;-)

Em 26/11/2009 19:00, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> escreveu:


good to let us know.
I do not see pharo getting up to 130 Mb.


On Nov 26, 2009, at 9:53 PM, [hidden email] wrote:


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

2009/11/26 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
> good to let us know.
> I do not see pharo getting up to 130 Mb.
>

apart from it, i can second that Pharo windows feels noticeable slower
than Squeak,
even if i change theme to 'standard squeak'.




--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project