Since the BlogApplication needs to be fixed anyway, may I suggest that it be re-written using Formula rather than Magritte? This is another one of Nico Petton's fine articles describing how Formula provides a simple way to specify forms and data validation. It's a very well thought-out package. http://smalltalk.gnu.org/blog/nico/formula-building-nice-validated-forms-iliad-ease Rather than fix the BlogApplication to work with the latest Iliad API, it'd be good to re-write it as a sample Formula application to illustrate how Formula works. |
Le vendredi 05 mars 2010 à 11:48 -0800, Freddy a écrit :
> Since the BlogApplication needs to be fixed anyway, may I suggest that > it be re-written using Formula rather than Magritte? > > This is another one of Nico Petton's fine articles describing how > Formula provides a simple way to specify forms and data validation. > It's a very well thought-out package. > > http://smalltalk.gnu.org/blog/nico/formula-building-nice-validated-forms-iliad-ease > > Rather than fix the BlogApplication to work with the latest Iliad API, > it'd be good to re-write it as a sample Formula application to > illustrate how Formula works. That's a nice idea :) We really need more examples in Iliad anyway. What about a real blog application using formula, with blog comments, etc? I was also thinking about writing another application example, a book store maybe, demonstrating formula, routes, and sequences. Cheers! Nico signature.asc (204 bytes) Download Attachment |
On 6 mar, 02:48, Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> wrote: > Le vendredi 05 mars 2010 à 11:48 -0800, Freddy a écrit : > > > Rather than fix the BlogApplication to work with the latest Iliad API, > > it'd be good to re-write it as a sample Formula application to > > illustrate how Formula works. > > Hi Freddy, > > That's a nice idea :) > > We really need more examples in Iliad anyway. What about a real blog > application using formula, with blog comments, etc? Hi Nico, Thanks, I think using Formula for these types of applications would be an excellent idea. It would be really good to have a real blog application as well. The only caveat is that I think that the examples should be simple and lightweight to get the main points across. Thus perhaps, we can have 2 versions: a simple, unpolished blog application that goes into the Iliad-More-Examples package which illustrates how to use Formula and how to show build widgets in Iliad, and a fully developed, full-featured blog application that goes into some other directory, such as Iliad-Applications. > I was also thinking about writing another application example, a book > store maybe, demonstrating formula, routes, and sequences. > Now that would be fantastic! People who would like to use Iliad for e- commerce on-line shopping applications would be very interested in the details of how Iliad connects its components. May I suggest one other application? At one time, you posted a message to the Seaside list asking how to create a web application (main application) that consists of a navigation menu (sidebar) and a contents component. http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/2007-April/011830.html When the user selects an item from the navigation panel (sidebar), the contents page should then update. The web app would consist of a parent widget with 2 child widgets: the sidebar and the contents window. The question is how should one structure the code. In Seaside, the preferred solution would be to use Announcements: http://onsmalltalk.com/maintaining-loose-coupling-in-seaside-components This way, the 2 child applications can communicate with each other without having to know about their parent, thereby reducing coupling, and making for more re-usable components. This is a great solution for Seaside, and a great solution for Iliad as well. I think an example of such as design would be of tremendous benefit for Iliad users, as they can then start to build re-usable components for Iliad. In fact, we can then start putting together a library or repository of re-usable widgets for Iliad so that developers can quickly create web applications in Iliad with very little effort. I've come to really like Iliad, because I think it has the nicest set of abstractions for web development. It does much of what Seaside does (allowing widgets to call/showOn other widgets as well as embed themselves in other widgets) without continuations and without an overly complex design. It also takes the nice element composability of Aida/Web along with its deep integration with Javascript and Ajax so that one can build a web page easily in either top-down or bottom- up fashion, without having to create a large tree of nested rendering code that Seaside requires. I've very pleased with how pleasant and effortless it has been to create web apps in Iliad. Thus, I think a library of highly re-usable widgets would make web programming a pure joy in Iliad, compared to any other web framework around. |
> Hi Nico, > > Thanks, I think using Formula for these types of applications would be > an excellent idea. It would be really good to have a real blog > application as well. The only caveat is that I think that the > examples should be simple and lightweight to get the main points > across. Thus perhaps, we can have 2 versions: a simple, unpolished > blog application that goes into the Iliad-More-Examples package which > illustrates how to use Formula and how to show build widgets in Iliad, > and a fully developed, full-featured blog application that goes into > some other directory, such as Iliad-Applications. > > > > I was also thinking about writing another application example, a book > > store maybe, demonstrating formula, routes, and sequences. > > > > Now that would be fantastic! People who would like to use Iliad for e- > commerce on-line shopping applications would be very interested in the > details of how Iliad connects its components. > > May I suggest one other application? At one time, you posted a > message to the Seaside list asking how to create a web application > (main application) that consists of a navigation menu (sidebar) and a > contents component. > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/2007-April/011830.html > > When the user selects an item from the navigation panel (sidebar), the > contents page should then update. The web app would consist of a > parent widget with 2 child widgets: the sidebar and the contents > window. The question is how should one structure the code. In > Seaside, the preferred solution would be to use Announcements: > > http://onsmalltalk.com/maintaining-loose-coupling-in-seaside-components > > This way, the 2 child applications can communicate with each other > without having to know about their parent, thereby reducing coupling, > and making for more re-usable components. This is a great solution > for Seaside, and a great solution for Iliad as well. I think an > example of such as design would be of tremendous benefit for Iliad > users, as they can then start to build re-usable components for > Iliad. In fact, we can then start putting together a library or > repository of re-usable widgets for Iliad so that developers can > quickly create web applications in Iliad with very little effort. applications. Now to use them in an example, we have to use a compatible implementation across dialects, or even include one in Iliad. > > I've come to really like Iliad, because I think it has the nicest set > of abstractions for web development. It does much of what Seaside > does (allowing widgets to call/showOn other widgets as well as embed > themselves in other widgets) without continuations and without an > overly complex design. It also takes the nice element composability > of Aida/Web along with its deep integration with Javascript and Ajax > so that one can build a web page easily in either top-down or bottom- > up fashion, without having to create a large tree of nested rendering > code that Seaside requires. > > I've very pleased with how pleasant and effortless it has been to > create web apps in Iliad. Thus, I think a library of highly re-usable > widgets would make web programming a pure joy in Iliad, compared to > any other web framework around. Yes, that's the idea behind Iliad-More-UI. Unfortunately, a lot of widgets are still missing there. Cheers! Nico signature.asc (204 bytes) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |