Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Re: new website about Artefact

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Bob Nemec

Re: new website about Artefact

Is there any interest or plan in porting Artefact to other Smalltalk dialects?

I image there would be few dependencies to deal with, like UnitValue.

I've worked with PDF4Smalltalk on VW, but porting it proved be a challenge because of namespace collisions (it has classes Boolean, Integer, Date, etc).

Thanks,

Bob Nemec

pharo4Stef@free.fr

Re: new website about Artefact

Is there any interest or plan in porting Artefact to other Smalltalk dialects?

We would prefer to improve it :)

and build on top.

I image there would be few dependencies to deal with, like UnitValue.

I've worked with PDF4Smalltalk on VW, but porting it proved be a challenge because of namespace collisions (it has classes Boolean, Integer, Date, etc).

why we ported Moose to Pharo and we handled the namespace.

Thanks,
Bob Nemec

Stephan Eggermont-3

Re: new website about Artefact

In reply to this post by Bob Nemec

I’ve heard some interest in porting Artefact to Gemstone.

There is one trait that can be replaced by a method further up the
hierarchy.

Stephan

Bob Nemec

Re: new website about Artefact

Having Artefact on GemStone is something I could use, and porting it something I can help with.

I suspect that porting it to VW & VA afterwards would not be too much work, and again something I can help with.

Our app uses R4PReport which sits on top of PDF4Smalltalk. Having it also work with Artefact would not be difficult.

Let me know how I could help (bnemec at gmail dot com),

Bob

On Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:22:06 PM, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote:

I’ve heard some interest in porting Artefact to Gemstone.

There is one trait that can be replaced by a method further up the
hierarchy.

Stephan

Bob Nemec