Or I might suggest 'generated using'. However perhaps instead we should
simplify the version information. What image was used to generate the C
code is only rarely of interest, remove it from the overall version
information and add a --verbose-version or the like with the current
information, maybe even more.
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:49 -0300, Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
> Janko MivÅ¡ek wrote:
> > So I propose that the version report is more descriptive, like:
> > VM version: 3.10-1 #1 Thu Apr 10 14:52:07 PDT 2008 gcc 4.1.2
> > built for image: Squeak3.10beta of 22 July 2007 [latest update: #7159]
> > ...
> I think "built using image: Squeak3.10beta..." would explain the
> situation better.
> -- Jecel