I just read an article that said React.js is slowly replacing AngularJS as the JS framework for front-end programming. Angular is still going strong, but React appears to be gaining popularity. Perhaps we should integrate Amber with React? Get ahead of the curve...
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
I asked first ;-) https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/amber-lang/YxWQs-4_AqQ but got no reaction :-(
But I did not mean it so literally (integrate with), i would be against _tight_ integration. Richard Eng wrote: > I just read an article that said React.js is slowly replacing > AngularJS as *the* JS framework for front-end programming. Angular is > still going strong, but React appears to be gaining popularity. > Perhaps we should integrate Amber with React? Get ahead of the curve... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "amber-lang" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Herby Vojčík wrote: > I asked first ;-) > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/amber-lang/YxWQs-4_AqQ but got > no reaction :-( > But I did not mean it so literally (integrate with), i would be > against _tight_ integration. OTOH, if someone thinks it is worth it, a tight integrration can be spun off a s fork project, with the blessing from core Amber side. I would rather go in a way of "make it possible and easy to mix those two", but still having them apart. > Richard Eng wrote: >> I just read an article that said React.js is slowly replacing >> AngularJS as *the* JS framework for front-end programming. Angular is >> still going strong, but React appears to be gaining popularity. >> Perhaps we should integrate Amber with React? Get ahead of the curve... >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "amber-lang" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to amber-la >> <mailto:[hidden email]>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by horrido
Angular2 blows React out of the water, so... On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Excerpts from [hidden email]'s message of 2015-12-01 19:32:32 +0100:
> Angular2 blows React out of the water, so... how so? links, references, examples? greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org secretary beijinglug.org mentor fossasia.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Martin Bähr <[hidden email]> wrote: Excerpts from [hidden email]'s message of 2015-12-01 19:32:32 +0100: You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Well, that's only with respect to performance. Even the article states that all the frameworks are likely fast enough to meet your needs.
-- On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 15:21:37 UTC-5, [hidden email] wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Herby Vojčík
Sorry, you're right. I didn't mean integrate tightly; I meant just provide a means of using Amber with React.
-- On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 12:33:19 UTC-5, Herby wrote: I asked first ;-) <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/amber-lang/YxWQs-4_AqQ" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/amber-lang/YxWQs-4_AqQ';return true;" onclick="this.href='https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/amber-lang/YxWQs-4_AqQ';return true;">https://groups.google.com/ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |