Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7582 posts
|
Hi,
After loading this: Simple after and before MetaLinks are taken into account, with just one check in #visitNode of the ASTTranslator that is false when no links are there. (which means this slice should not impact anything) For now this is for very simple MetaLinks: no parameters, no condition, no reification, no #instead/around, no meta-level modelling. Here is a trivial example: 1) get a AST node from our example method: sendNode := (ReflectivityExamples>>#exampleMethod) ast body statements first value. 2) then we define a link that is just #halt: link := MetaLink new metaObject: Halt; selector: #now. 3) we set it: sendNode link: link. 4) when we now execute the method, we get a halt: ReflectivityExamples new exampleMethod 5) to get rid of it, uninstall the link: link uninstall. If you look at the byte code, you see that it compiles the link to the code: 25 <20> pushConstant: Halt 26 <D1> send: now Marcus |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5447 posts
|
That is very cool. But I need to ask the tough question - given that the feature freeze was three weeks ago, what do we gain by adding this in Pharo 4?
* Is it needed for demonstrations that won't be based off latest features in Pharo 5 ? * Are third party libraries expected to be based only off Pharo 4 MetaLink features, rather than additional MetaLink features it sounds like Pharo 5 will get ? > which means this slice should not impact anything Because "should" being the operative word... is a slippery slope. If we have a philosophy of freezing features before a Release, then we should have the discipline to hold to that - at least in last 7 days before Release. cheers -ben On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7582 posts
|
> On 22 Mar 2015, at 11:33, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: > > That is very cool. But I need to ask the tough question - given that the feature freeze was three weeks ago, what do we gain by adding this in Pharo 4? > > * Is it needed for demonstrations that won't be based off latest features in Pharo 5 ? > > * Are third party libraries expected to be based only off Pharo 4 MetaLink features, rather than additional MetaLink features it sounds like Pharo 5 will get ? > > > which means this slice should not impact anything > > Because "should" being the operative word... is a slippery slope. If we have a philosophy of freezing features before a Release, then we should have the discipline to hold to that - at least in last 7 days before Release. > ... [show rest of quote] Yes, maybe we should postpone it… releasing is boring, I have to admit :-) Marcus |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7582 posts
|
... [show rest of quote] I will revert the change in the visitor… this way we are sure that we do not get any problems.I am really looking forward to that in Pharo5… it is (one of my) largest mistakes that after my PhD I did not focus on getting Reflectivity into Pharo… it is still amazing, even 5 years later, I think. (but I am biased ;-) Marcus |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5447 posts
|
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] Thanks Marcus. It sets a good example for everyone (including me). Anyway, its a nice bit of honey to draw more people to follow the Pharo 5 trunk ;) cheers -ben |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7582 posts
|
I will be so great that nobody will use Pharo4 ever… ;-) Marcus
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7411 posts
|
Indeed, it is an amazing piece of work :). Doru On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7582 posts
|
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
This is now back in 5.0 #005
... [show rest of quote] -- |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |