On 24 Sep 2014, at 18:35, Juraj Kubelka <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thank you Marcus for the explanation.
>
> So now I understand that if I want to analyse existing packages/class/methods/etc in the image, Ring is not a kind of interest.
>
> But as I think about it, if someone uses Ring as a base to analyse environment, then it could be useful to use the same analysis tool for any source, e.g. not loaded packages. Am I right or are the some limitations?
>
>
That is the idea… Ring Definition and normal classes/methods share a common API and can be used interchangeably.
Marcus