Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Moose

Roassal TRConstraint deprecation

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Peter Uhnak

Roassal TRConstraint deprecation

Hi Alex,

you've marked TRConstraint as obsolete, however not all behavior has been yet implemented in new RTConstraint.

Namely methods from "public - resizing", "public - camera", and "public - aligning".

Secondly I am not sure about the name of RTConstraint class>>child:parent: (Tudor also didn't like the name when he saw it. :))

I don't think the naming fits well into Roassal... maybe RTConstraint class>>on:backElement: ?

Thanks,

Peter

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

abergel

Re: Roassal TRConstraint deprecation

> you've marked TRConstraint as obsolete, however not all behavior has been yet implemented in new RTConstraint.
>
> Namely methods from "public - resizing", "public - camera", and "public - aligning”.

You’re picky! Excellent!
I think we need particular classes such as RTAlignment and RTResizing.
We will work on this over the next two weeks.

> Secondly I am not sure about the name of RTConstraint class>>child:parent: (Tudor also didn't like the name when he saw it. :))
> I don't think the naming fits well into Roassal... maybe RTConstraint class>>on:backElement: ?

I have renamed it as on: aChildShape background: aParentShape

Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Peter Uhnak

Re: Roassal TRConstraint deprecation

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

> you've marked TRConstraint as obsolete, however not all behavior has been yet implemented in new RTConstraint.
>
> Namely methods from "public - resizing", "public - camera", and "public - aligning”.

You’re picky! Excellent!
I think we need particular classes such as RTAlignment and RTResizing.

in that case there should be also RTMoving (or RTMovementConstraint) since RTConstraint can mean anything.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

abergel

Re: Roassal TRConstraint deprecation

In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak

I have created a class RTResize. It is much more flexible to resize elements.

Cheers,

Alexandre

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

On Jul 22, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Alex,

you've marked TRConstraint as obsolete, however not all behavior has been yet implemented in new RTConstraint.

Namely methods from "public - resizing", "public - camera", and "public - aligning".

Secondly I am not sure about the name of RTConstraint class>>child:parent: (Tudor also didn't like the name when he saw it. :))
I don't think the naming fits well into Roassal... maybe RTConstraint class>>on:backElement: ?

Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev