Roassal2 CI discrepancy

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Roassal2 CI discrepancy

Uko2
Hi,

I’ve just downloaded roassal2 image from https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/roassal2/. Problem is next.

On the CI server Roassal2 is loaded into Pharo3 image. But if you open it, there are some problems, as GT inspector is not present there. I could just make it to load into pharo 4 image, or make a matrix job. But I want to rise attention, because this is a sign that roassal conf. loads broken things…

Uko

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Roassal2 CI discrepancy

abergel
Hi Uko,

I do not understand. This job uses Pharo 3.0, so there is no GT.
This job is actually useful to check whether Roassal tests pass in Pharo 3.0. Maybe we should have one for Pharo 4.0.

On https://ci.inria.fr/moose/ I cannot see how to add a new job. What are instruction? Also, there are some obsolete job, such as Graph-ET, Graph-ET2, Roassal. They are more than obsolete.

Cheers,
Alexandre


> On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ve just downloaded roassal2 image from https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/roassal2/. Problem is next.
>
> On the CI server Roassal2 is loaded into Pharo3 image. But if you open it, there are some problems, as GT inspector is not present there. I could just make it to load into pharo 4 image, or make a matrix job. But I want to rise attention, because this is a sign that roassal conf. loads broken things…
>
> Uko
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Roassal2 CI discrepancy

Uko2
Ok, so I’ve renamed current job to roassal2(3), and created a matrix job: https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/Roassal2/

Please let me know if it’s ok. Then we can delete the old one.

Uko

P.S. my point is that if I download Pharo3 with roassal, it’s not working. Maybe we can fix roassal version for pharo 3 on something that was completely compatible.


On 06 Dec 2014, at 11:50, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Uko,

I do not understand. This job uses Pharo 3.0, so there is no GT.
This job is actually useful to check whether Roassal tests pass in Pharo 3.0. Maybe we should have one for Pharo 4.0.

On https://ci.inria.fr/moose/ I cannot see how to add a new job. What are instruction? Also, there are some obsolete job, such as Graph-ET, Graph-ET2, Roassal. They are more than obsolete.

Cheers,
Alexandre


On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I’ve just downloaded roassal2 image from https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/roassal2/. Problem is next.

On the CI server Roassal2 is loaded into Pharo3 image. But if you open it, there are some problems, as GT inspector is not present there. I could just make it to load into pharo 4 image, or make a matrix job. But I want to rise attention, because this is a sign that roassal conf. loads broken things…

Uko
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Roassal2 CI discrepancy

Tudor Girba-2
In reply to this post by abergel
What Uko is saying is that the examples browser depends on GT. We should probably package that one together with GT-InspectorExtensions-CoreRoassal.

Cheers,
Doru

On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Uko,

I do not understand. This job uses Pharo 3.0, so there is no GT.
This job is actually useful to check whether Roassal tests pass in Pharo 3.0. Maybe we should have one for Pharo 4.0.

On https://ci.inria.fr/moose/ I cannot see how to add a new job. What are instruction? Also, there are some obsolete job, such as Graph-ET, Graph-ET2, Roassal. They are more than obsolete.

Cheers,
Alexandre


> On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ve just downloaded roassal2 image from https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/roassal2/. Problem is next.
>
> On the CI server Roassal2 is loaded into Pharo3 image. But if you open it, there are some problems, as GT inspector is not present there. I could just make it to load into pharo 4 image, or make a matrix job. But I want to rise attention, because this is a sign that roassal conf. loads broken things…
>
> Uko
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev