hi alex
the baseline is wrong because it does not depend on roassal. Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around. development should be better a baseline than this development: spec "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" <symbolicVersion: #development > "For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'. I can fix it if you give me access.... Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
> the baseline is wrong because it does not depend on roassal.
If Metacello handles well cycle, then why not to add a reference to Roassal. I will try to have access to the repository. It is not mine. Alexandre > Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around. > > development should be better a baseline than this > > development: spec > "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. > The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" > <symbolicVersion: #development > > > "For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. > Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" > spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'. > > I can fix it if you give me access.... > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Alex
Look at the difference between XMLSupport and XMLWriter, XMLParser. Tell me if I should explain it. We should avoid to mix ConfigurationAsProject and ConfigurationAsDependencies. But you tell me and I have no problem to fork my own. I will not spend time to manage a system that I cannot get clean. Stef >> the baseline is wrong because it does not depend on roassal. > If Metacello handles well cycle, then why not to add a reference to Roassal. > > I will try to have access to the repository. It is not mine. > > Alexandre > >> Then there is again this FuelMetalevel version that is around. >> >> development should be better a baseline than this >> >> development: spec >> "By convention the development branch should point to a fixed version that is regularly updated and might contain unstable code. >> The name used by Metacello is only defined by the following pragma:" >> <symbolicVersion: #development > >> >> "For the development tag refer to a fixed version which you update if you commit new code. >> Note that you can refer here to any other version name from this configuration" >> spec for: #'common' version: 'dev'. >> >> I can fix it if you give me access.... >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |