Ruby SmaCC parser
Locked
 
|
I remember there was some interests here about analyzing Ruby programs
with MOOSE, and apparently there is a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC (Smalltalk/X version): https://swing.fit.cvut.cz/projects/smallruby Look inside the svn repository to find the code. I dunno the licence. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Serge,
one could ask Jan Vrany about it :). Jan, is that Ok if someone reuse this code (as in adding a Ruby parser to the SmaCC collection) ? Thierry 2016-06-17 12:18 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]>: I remember there was some interests here about analyzing Ruby programs _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi, yes, that's perfectly fine! However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-) If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse it), If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it spit out sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that. If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please let me know. Good luck! Jan
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Thierry Goubier <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Jan,
2016-06-17 14:20 GMT+02:00 Jan Vrany <[hidden email]>:
Thanks.
I saw that there are a lot of unimplemented stuff in the grammar... or at least messages saying so :)
I will if I do.
Thanks, Thierry
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Jan, hi Thierry,
Thanks for this. What is the license of the existing parser? Is it MIT? Cheers, Doru > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Thierry Goubier <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > 2016-06-17 14:20 GMT+02:00 Jan Vrany <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > yes, that's perfectly fine! > > Thanks. > > However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is > bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite > challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-) > > I saw that there are a lot of unimplemented stuff in the grammar... or at least messages saying so :) > > If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse it), > If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it spit out > sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that. > > If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please > let me know. > > I will if I do. > > Good luck! > > Thanks, > > Thierry > > > Jan > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Thierry Goubier <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Serge, >> >> one could ask Jan Vrany about it :). Jan, is that Ok if someone reuse this code (as in adding a Ruby parser to the SmaCC collection) ? >> >> Thierry >> >> >> 2016-06-17 12:18 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]>: >> I remember there was some interests here about analyzing Ruby programs >> with MOOSE, and apparently there is a complete Ruby parser done with >> SmaCC (Smalltalk/X version): >> https://swing.fit.cvut.cz/projects/smallruby >> >> Look inside the svn repository to find the code. I dunno the licence. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jan Vrany
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Jan Vrany <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi, > > yes, that's perfectly fine! > However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is > bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite > challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-) Sorry I was maybe a little bit optimistic here :-) > If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse > it), > If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it > spit out > sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that. > > If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please > let me know. This is more to add to the exiting collections of Parser of Thierry. Thank you. -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |