Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Running a test method in Nautilus

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

7 messages Options

abergel

Running a test method in Nautilus

Hi!

I can run a test method by pressing the button located on the left hand side of the method name. If the test fail, it does not open a debugger. I need to run it a second time. This is a rather odd behavior.
Am I the only one to experience this?

Side question:
I try to check on the bug tracker if there is something about that, but I was not able to find it. I entered in the search input field the tree keywords: test button nautilus
The result is https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=test+button+nautilus
However, this indicates many closed issues. How can I filter out the close issues?

Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Peter Uhnak

Re: Running a test method in Nautilus

If the test fail, it does not open a debugger.

This happens when I click on the button next to the _class_, however I've never experienced such problem with the button next to a _method_.

Peter

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi!

I can run a test method by pressing the button located on the left hand side of the method name. If the test fail, it does not open a debugger. I need to run it a second time. This is a rather odd behavior.
Am I the only one to experience this?

Side question:
I try to check on the bug tracker if there is something about that, but I was not able to find it. I entered in the search input field the tree keywords: test button nautilus
The result is https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=test+button+nautilus
However, this indicates many closed issues. How can I filter out the close issues?

Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

demarey

Re: Running a test method in Nautilus

I do experience the same thing with Guille today.

Before, Nautilus ran twice the method for a failed test: one to get the status of the test and another one for the debugger.

Maybe in Nautilus cleanup, it was removed.

Le 11 sept. 2015 à 16:34, Peter Uhnák a écrit :

If the test fail, it does not open a debugger.

This happens when I click on the button next to the _class_, however I've never experienced such problem with the button next to a _method_.

Peter

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

I can run a test method by pressing the button located on the left hand side of the method name. If the test fail, it does not open a debugger. I need to run it a second time. This is a rather odd behavior.
Am I the only one to experience this?

Side question:
I try to check on the bug tracker if there is something about that, but I was not able to find it. I entered in the search input field the tree keywords: test button nautilus
The result is https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=test+button+nautilus
However, this indicates many closed issues. How can I filter out the close issues?

Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment

Marcus Denker-4

Re: Running a test method in Nautilus

> On 11 Sep 2015, at 16:37, Christophe Demarey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I do experience the same thing with Guille today.
> Before, Nautilus ran twice the method for a failed test: one to get the status of the test and another one for the debugger.
> Maybe in Nautilus cleanup, it was removed.
>
Yes, I removed that double runnning.. this was not a good idea. Now it is much simpler.

And yes, it is better to directly open the debugger when running single tests explicitly.

I will fix it.

Marcus

Marcus Denker-4

Re: Running a test method in Nautilus

In reply to this post by abergel

the left hand side of the method name. If the test fail, it does not open a debugger. I need to run it a second time. This is a rather odd behavior.
> Am I the only one to experience this?
>
> Side question:
> I try to check on the bug tracker if there is something about that, but I was not able to find it. I entered in the search input field the tree keywords: test button nautilus
> The result is https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/search/?sSearchFor=test+button+nautilus
> However, this indicates many closed issues. How can I filter out the close issues?
>
Yes, it is annoying that the default for the search is to search closed issues.

You can, though, filter the search results. Press “+Refine Further”, there are many things, amount them “Open or Closed”. Select Open.

Marcus

abergel

Re: Running a test method in Nautilus

Excellent!

Thanks ! Works!

Alexandre

> On Sep 11, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> However, this indicates many closed issues. How can I filter out the close issues?
>>
> Yes, it is annoying that the default for the search is to search closed issues.
>
> You can, though, filter the search results. Press “+Refine Further”, there are many things, amount them “Open or Closed”. Select Open.

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

abergel

Re: Running a test method in Nautilus

In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4

Thanks! That would be fantastic.

Alexandre

> On Sep 11, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 11 Sep 2015, at 16:37, Christophe Demarey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I do experience the same thing with Guille today.
>> Before, Nautilus ran twice the method for a failed test: one to get the status of the test and another one for the debugger.
>> Maybe in Nautilus cleanup, it was removed.
>>
> Yes, I removed that double runnning.. this was not a good idea. Now it is much simpler.
>
> And yes, it is better to directly open the debugger when running single tests explicitly.
>
> I will fix it.
>
> Marcus
>
>

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.