Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the
SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? frank |
is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :)
Esteban On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the > SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? > > frank > |
On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :) > And I think we retired both the Mac and the Windows special implementations and just use the Unix one on all three architectures. OpenSSL supports all. Marcus > Esteban > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the >> SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? >> >> frank >> > > |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
On 18 March 2013 16:41, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
> is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :) What failures did it have? It's the first I've heard of any (but to be fair I have only recently started looking at the plugin). frank > Esteban > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the >> SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? >> >> frank >> > > |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
On 18 March 2013 16:45, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :) >> > > And I think we retired both the Mac and the Windows special implementations and > just use the Unix one on all three architectures. OpenSSL supports all. Right, because the Mac and Windows ones spoke to the respective special crypto libraries. Sounds sensible! (Also, if you support OpenSSL you support much more than just Mac, Linux & Windows - the BSDs use OpenSSL, for example.) frank > Marcus > >> Esteban >> >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the >>> SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? >>> >>> frank >>> >> >> > > |
ye, well... that... I didn't remember :) but yes, camillo and me spent couple of days rewriting the plugin to use same library in all platforms (we did the same with the file plugin, btw).
On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 18 March 2013 16:45, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :) >>> >> >> And I think we retired both the Mac and the Windows special implementations and >> just use the Unix one on all three architectures. OpenSSL supports all. > > Right, because the Mac and Windows ones spoke to the respective > special crypto libraries. Sounds sensible! (Also, if you support > OpenSSL you support much more than just Mac, Linux & Windows - the > BSDs use OpenSSL, for example.) > > frank > >> Marcus >> >>> Esteban >>> >>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the >>>> SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? >>>> >>>> frank >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > |
On 2013-03-18, at 18:11, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > ye, well... that... I didn't remember :) but yes, camillo and me spent couple of days rewriting the plugin to use same library in all platforms (we did the same with the file plugin, btw). AFAIK we were not able to retrieve the proper header files under windows I think :D something strange anyway ;) > On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On 18 March 2013 16:45, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :) >>>> >>> >>> And I think we retired both the Mac and the Windows special implementations and >>> just use the Unix one on all three architectures. OpenSSL supports all. >> >> Right, because the Mac and Windows ones spoke to the respective >> special crypto libraries. Sounds sensible! (Also, if you support >> OpenSSL you support much more than just Mac, Linux & Windows - the >> BSDs use OpenSSL, for example.) >> >> frank >> >>> Marcus >>> >>>> Esteban >>>> >>>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the >>>>> SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? >>>>> >>>>> frank >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
OK, fair enough. I'm just rather curious because I've only recently
_needed_ SSL, and so it looks like Squeak will start to ship with the plugin. Seeing as both communities share most of the VM infrastructure, it makes sense to keep doing so. So if you guys are happy with the cross-platform-ness of your version of the plugin, it only makes sense to fold that upstream: Dave Lewis has already made steps in VMMaker, but hasn't yet moved source around. And of course the "canonical repository" at https://code.google.com/p/squeakssl/ no longer has a maintainer. frank On 18 March 2013 17:11, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > ye, well... that... I didn't remember :) but yes, camillo and me spent couple of days rewriting the plugin to use same library in all platforms (we did the same with the file plugin, btw). > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On 18 March 2013 16:45, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> is the same old plugin... but now it works (it was failing) and it builds automatically :) >>>> >>> >>> And I think we retired both the Mac and the Windows special implementations and >>> just use the Unix one on all three architectures. OpenSSL supports all. >> >> Right, because the Mac and Windows ones spoke to the respective >> special crypto libraries. Sounds sensible! (Also, if you support >> OpenSSL you support much more than just Mac, Linux & Windows - the >> BSDs use OpenSSL, for example.) >> >> frank >> >>> Marcus >>> >>>> Esteban >>>> >>>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just so I can keep track of commonality between Squeak and Pharo, the >>>>> SSL plugin - is that Andreas' SqueakSSL plugin? >>>>> >>>>> frank >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |