What is the simplest way to scale printer output? I am trying to do something like this, but I don't see any effect. cg := self getGC getDC. cg winHdc setMapMode: 8 "MmAnisotropic". cg setViewportExtent: drawable extent. Thanks, -Carl You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VA Smalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/va-smalltalk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Oh, I got it. cg winHdc setMapMode: 8 "MmAnisotropic". cg winHdc setWindowOrgEx: 0 nY: 0 lpPoint: nil. cg winHdc setWindowExtEx: 800 nY: 1050 lpSize: nil. "original render extent" cg winHdc setViewportOrgEx: 0 nY: 0 lpPoint: nil. cg winHdc setViewportExtEx: 4800 nY: 6299 lpSize: nil. "printer page resolution" -Carl On Friday, June 27, 2014 10:47:29 AM UTC-4, Carl Gundel wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VA Smalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/va-smalltalk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Administrator
|
On Friday, June 27, 2014 1:11:59 PM UTC-7, Carl Gundel wrote:
--
You will want to be careful about Anisotropic scaling. It will cause distortion in your images. Fortunately, your numbers above are nearly perfectly 6:6. I would suggest you select an Isotropic mode until you know you need anisotropic scaling. You probably also want all four upper bounds to be "size - 1". e.g. 'size' pixels are enumerated as 0 .. size - 1 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VA Smalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/va-smalltalk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Thanks Richard. The application I am porting uses anisotropic scaling, so I will need a good reason to change it. -Carl On Friday, June 27, 2014 6:45:51 PM UTC-4, Richard Sargent wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VA Smalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/va-smalltalk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Administrator
|
On Monday, June 30, 2014 8:40:32 AM UTC-7, Carl Gundel wrote:
--
I understand. However, if the application itself uses anisotropic scaling AND you allow a second level of anisotropy, your printed output may differ from the previews on screen. The hard-copy should faithfully reproduce the model. However, in your case, the scaling factors you use are effectively isotropic and so not really a problem. (Other than the "range too big by 1", previously mentioned.) You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VA Smalltalk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/va-smalltalk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |