SciSmalltalk first commit

>
> As a test, i commit the random number generator available here:
> http://www.squeaksource.com/Random.html
>
> I put here a list of potential existing code that could be integrated
> in SciSmalltalk:
> https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk/wiki/Existing-Math-packages-in-Smalltalk
> I will asked the authors if they agree to package their code in SciSmalltalk.
>
> In order to have something coherent, every sub-librairies of
> Sci-Smalltalk should be packaged as 'Math-XXX'. Right now, i have
> Math-Random and Math-Random-Tests.
>
> SciSmalltalk will contain only code released under MIT licence.
>
> Any comments ?
> Best regards,
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> http://doesnotunderstand.org/
>

>
> On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is
>> available here:
>> https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
>
> just a question why not ss3?

>>
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is
>>> available here:
>>> https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
>>
>> just a question why not ss3?
>
> Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
> I will push a copy on ss3 also.

>>>
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> i made the first commit for the SciSmalltalk project. The code is
>>>> available here:
>>>> https://github.com/SergeStinckwich/SciSmalltalk
>>>
>>> just a question why not ss3?
>>
>> Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
>> I will push a copy on ss3 also.
>
> My point is that how can I work and merge using monticello if this is only pubslihed on git.
> I just tend to avoid to lose time with on-going solutions. So if you really people to help
> use the tools they use.

> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Serge,
>>
>> On 03 Apr 2012, at 03:24, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>
>>> Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
>>
>> Yes, if MCFileTreeRepository lives up to its promise, and apparently it does, because you are using it, that is really great. Does it really work transparently ?
>
> This is not transparent because you need to commit with git but this
> quite easy to do that.
> What is only missing for me is the way to generate .mcz file
> automatically from a MCFileTreeRepository.
>
> I love that you can commit other files than Smalltalk code on your
> repo (pictures, README file …).

>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Serge,
>>>
>>> On 03 Apr 2012, at 03:24, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because i love git and the FileTree monticello repository work done by Dale ;-)
>>>
>>> Yes, if MCFileTreeRepository lives up to its promise, and apparently it does, because you are using it, that is really great. Does it really work transparently ?
>>
>> This is not transparent because you need to commit with git but this
>> quite easy to do that.
>> What is only missing for me is the way to generate .mcz file
>> automatically from a MCFileTreeRepository.
>>
>> I love that you can commit other files than Smalltalk code on your
>> repo (pictures, README file …).
>
> sure me too. I support the integration but I do not want alpha version for my alpha work :)