SciSmalltalk on Pharo 5.0

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SciSmalltalk on Pharo 5.0

SergeStinckwich
Hi all,

I modify the CI configuration on INRIA server. We have builds for
Pharo 5.0 now ;-)
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/

I guess we can remove 3.0 support now ?
Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Uko
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SciSmalltalk on Pharo 5.0

Uko
Do we have a fixed version of Pharo 3 or it is advancing? Because we can live CI running for pharo 3 and as soon as new update breaks it - we fix version for pharo 3 and remove it from ci.

Uko

> On 22 Apr 2015, at 11:13, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I modify the CI configuration on INRIA server. We have builds for
> Pharo 5.0 now ;-)
> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/
>
> I guess we can remove 3.0 support now ?
> Regards,
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SciSmalltalk on Pharo 5.0

SergeStinckwich
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Do we have a fixed version of Pharo 3 or it is advancing? Because we can live CI running for pharo 3 and as soon as new update breaks it - we fix version for pharo 3 and remove it from ci.

Yes there is no differences between Pharo versions.
We can remove Pharo 3.0 config later.

If someone is using Pharo 3.0, this is time to change ;-)

Apparently there is one bug of Pharo 3.0 regarding a test for GaussianGenerator:

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SciSmalltalk/PHARO=30,VERSION=stable,VM=vm/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/Math.Tests.Random/GaussianGeneratorTest/testDistribution/

I think this is an error that appears from time to time ...

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SciSmalltalk on Pharo 5.0

werner kassens-2
Hi,
imo one can remove pharo3.0. i'm developing a few things (automatic differentiation & optimization with constraints) that would probably work in 3.0 and where jenkins would not be bad for testing, but these things probably need quite a few weeks before they are ready for uploading, they are in a very early stage.

>one bug of Pharo 3.0 regarding a test for GaussianGenerator:
its not really a bug, its a randomized test that occasionally fails in every pharo version. and btw its not the only randomized test, that occassionally fails in scismalltalk, i have to admit, i also made some of those. of course one could fix a seed for the rng to prohibit that, but - well - i would not really like to do that in my tests, that test different combinations of numbers to find bugs that happen very seldom and are not visible in the general results of methods. and btw they are marked as 'randomized' tests in their name
werner

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SciSmalltalk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.