Scriptaculous vs SeasideAsync

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Scriptaculous vs SeasideAsync

Esteban A. Maringolo
Hi,

Which are the pros and cons of each one?
What is the mainstream of both?

I found a mail between Michael Bany and Lukas Renggli mentioning some
references,
which seems to favor the usage of Scriptaculous, but a recent
VisualWorks screencast
showing how to load SeasideAsync in VW made me think about it.

Best regards,

--
Esteban A. Maringolo
[hidden email]
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Scriptaculous vs SeasideAsync

Michael Lucas-Smith-3
Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Which are the pros and cons of each one?
> What is the mainstream of both?
>
> I found a mail between Michael Bany and Lukas Renggli mentioning some
> references,
> which seems to favor the usage of Scriptaculous, but a recent
> VisualWorks screencast
> showing how to load SeasideAsync in VW made me think about it.
>
>  
If you just want to do async callbacks from the web browser in to
Smalltalk, then SeasideAsync is a good pick. Scriptaculous is a big
framework filled with all manner of ajaxian like features, animations
and general javascript libraries.

It depends on what you want to achieve. You  might find it interesting
to compare the Scriptaculous code browser with the Async code browser
with the regular code browser.

Cheers,
Michael
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside