Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
Locked
 
|
Does
Scriptloader loadFFI work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. Bill _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
I think I found it: Andreas added a Pools sub-package, so #loadFFI needs to load it before the kernel. Right??
-----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI Does Scriptloader loadFFI work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. Bill _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
Yes, that is probably it. The separate Pools package was set up to permit
VMMaker to have just the Pools package as a prerequisite, rather than the entire FFI package. Dave On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I think I found it: Andreas added a Pools sub-package, so #loadFFI needs to load it before the kernel. Right?? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI > > Does > > Scriptloader loadFFI > > work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. > > Bill > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
Yes, that's probably it.
It was separated out as an individual package so it is less to load into a VMMaker-image, I believe. Cheers, Henry On 25.11.2009 00:56, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I think I found it: Andreas added a Pools sub-package, so #loadFFI needs to load it before the kernel. Right?? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI > > Does > > Scriptloader loadFFI > > work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
Have.. to... hit... refresh button before replying! ;)
On 25.11.2009 01:18, David T. Lewis wrote: > Yes, that is probably it. The separate Pools package was set up to permit > VMMaker to have just the Pools package as a prerequisite, rather than the > entire FFI package. > > Dave > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > >> I think I found it: Andreas added a Pools sub-package, so #loadFFI needs to load it before the kernel. Right?? >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K >> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM >> To: [hidden email] >> Subject: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI >> >> Does >> >> Scriptloader loadFFI >> >> work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. >> >> Bill >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
At least your email system *HAS* a refresh button. Could somebody please tell me what stranglehold MS has on the market??? I thought group wise was bad when they foisted that on us :(
-----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Henrik Sperre Johansen Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:21 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI Have.. to... hit... refresh button before replying! ;) On 25.11.2009 01:18, David T. Lewis wrote: > Yes, that is probably it. The separate Pools package was set up to > permit VMMaker to have just the Pools package as a prerequisite, > rather than the entire FFI package. > > Dave > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > >> I think I found it: Andreas added a Pools sub-package, so #loadFFI needs to load it before the kernel. Right?? >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [hidden email] >> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of >> Schwab,Wilhelm K >> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM >> To: [hidden email] >> Subject: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI >> >> Does >> >> Scriptloader loadFFI >> >> work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. >> >> Bill >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
Isn't this issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1478 ?
Adrian On Nov 25, 2009, at 01:48 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > At least your email system *HAS* a refresh button. Could somebody > please tell me what stranglehold MS has on the market??? I thought > group wise was bad when they foisted that on us :( > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email] > ] On Behalf Of Henrik Sperre Johansen > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:21 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI > > Have.. to... hit... refresh button before replying! ;) > > On 25.11.2009 01:18, David T. Lewis wrote: >> Yes, that is probably it. The separate Pools package was set up to >> permit VMMaker to have just the Pools package as a prerequisite, >> rather than the entire FFI package. >> >> Dave >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >> >>> I think I found it: Andreas added a Pools sub-package, so #loadFFI >>> needs to load it before the kernel. Right?? >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [hidden email] >>> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of >>> Schwab,Wilhelm K >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM >>> To: [hidden email] >>> Subject: [Pharo-project] Scriptloader class>>loadFFI >>> >>> Does >>> >>> Scriptloader loadFFI >>> >>> work in RC1? It's barking at me about FFIConstants. >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
yes, it is 1478 issue
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: Isn't this issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1478 ? _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
This is wrong. It is FFI-Pools not FFI-Pool. But I am sure I tested it. So, it seems On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: yes, it is 1478 issue _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:31:01PM +0100, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> This is wrong. It is FFI-Pools not FFI-Pool. But I am sure I tested > it. So, it seems > Andreas has changed it again. So, it must be: > > ScriptLoader>>loadFFI > self new installer monticello http: 'source.squeakfoundation.org'; > project: 'FFI'; > install: 'FFI-Pools'; > install: 'FFI-Kernel'; > install: 'FFI-Tests'; > install: 'FFI-Examples'. > (Smalltalk at: #ExternalType) initialize. > (Smalltalk at: #ExternalStructure) compileAllFields. > Smalltalk recreateSpecialObjectsArray. FYI, Andreas did not change it again. The change was only made once, and the reason was to allow the FFI pools to be a separate package that could be loaded into VMMaker without requiring all the rest of FFI. I did something similar when I put Speech on SqueakSource, so we can have only the necessary dependencies for VMMaker. Near term it is confusing to change packages, but gradually we are getting more modular :) Dave _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: Scriptloader class>>loadFFI
|
|
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:44 AM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
Weird....I am sure I tested with FFI-Pool and in addition most people put the fix with FFI-Pool. But now that package does not exists, and it is FFI-Pools. But anyway, I am not saying Andres is guilty. I am in favor of the continuous refactor :)
Excellent!! I totally agree with you :) Dave _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |