Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

Seamless

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

7 messages Options

Sean P. DeNigris

Seamless

Administrator

1. What is the status of this project (http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Seamless.html)? I see the last commit is in April. Does it "work"?
2. Can the communication be done securely? If I had two images each running on a server in a different physical location, could they communicate over something like SSL?

Cheers,
Sean

Nick Papoylias

Re: Seamless

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:

1. What is the status of this project
(http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Seamless.html)? I see the last commit is in
April. Does it "work"?

As an engineering pre-requisite for my research, yes ;)

You can already read: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01145792/document

go through the examples, and provide some feedback.

Soon there will be more engineering effort from RMoD to push,

all results from such prototypes forward.

2. Can the communication be done securely? If I had two images each running
on a server in a different physical location, could they communicate over
something like SSL?

Yes this is doable, although there is no SSL support in Seamless itself with minimal effort you can use ZdcSecureSocketStream (Zodiac-Core) with it.

Cheers,

Nick

-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Seamless-tp4840907.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

francescoagati

Re: Seamless

Hi,
i am testing with seamless on pharo 5 and all works really good. the only problem i see if i try to save the state of the image. if there is a connection active the vm freeze and stop to work. the only think i can do is quit and reopen it losing all changes.

stepharo

Re: Seamless

thanks for the report

Denis is on vacation and he will certainly reply to you.

Le 18/6/16 à 21:45, francescoagati a écrit :

> Hi,
> i am testing with seamless on pharo 5 and all works really good. the only
> problem i see if i try to save the state of the image. if there is a
> connection active the vm freeze and stop to work. the only think i can do is
> quit and reopen it losing all changes.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Seamless-tp4840907p4901703.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Denis Kudriashov

Re: Seamless

In reply to this post by francescoagati

2016-06-18 21:45 GMT+02:00 francescoagati <[hidden email]>:

Hi,
i am testing with seamless on pharo 5 and all works really good. the only
problem i see if i try to save the state of the image. if there is a
connection active the vm freeze and stop to work. the only think i can do is
quit and reopen it losing all changes.

New version is here http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Seamless (I will announce it soon). Do you use this one?

francescoagati

Re: Seamless

No i was using and old version finded in your pdf draft of seamless

Gofer it
url: 'http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Seamless';
package: 'ConfigurationOfSeamless';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfSeamless) project version: '0.4') load.

using the version on smalltalkhub all go good when save the image. the only problem finded is if i quit and restart the image with socket open.but i think that when the machine go down or up i must use a callback for start or kill the sockets.

Thanks

Denis Kudriashov

Re: Seamless

Hi.

Try stable version which I announced today.

In my tests saving images works fine. On image snapshot all connection are closed. Then they will lazily reopen by demand.

2016-06-19 23:31 GMT+02:00 francescoagati <[hidden email]>:

No i was using and old version finded in your pdf draft of seamless

Gofer it
url: 'http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Seamless';
package: 'ConfigurationOfSeamless';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfSeamless) project version: '0.4') load.

using the version on smalltalkhub all go good when save the image. the only
problem finded is if i quit and restart the image with socket open.but i
think that when the machine go down or up i must use a callback for start or
kill the sockets.

Thanks

--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Seamless-tp4840907p4901832.html

Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.