Hi,
Do we still want to support loading Seaside 3.2.0 in Pharo1.x ? Configuration management is getting overly complex _and_ some packages (Welcome, Rest, Slime, etc… are not being updated anymore for that platform). Opinions? Johan_______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Do we still want to support loading Seaside 3.2.0 in Pharo1.x ? > Configuration management is getting overly complex _and_ some packages (Welcome, Rest, Slime, etc… are not being updated anymore for that platform). > > Opinions? I'm still on 1.3 but I'm probably the only one. I would be fine if the configuration no longer supports 1.x and anybody who still wants to use 1.x would be on this own. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
Ok, for now I did not explicitly remove those sections, but I will be working on a new configuration baseline and drop them there. Probably that's for 3.3 though.
Btw, testContentsNotifying is failing since the latest changes. I'll take a look at the failing swagger tests now > On 23 Jul 2015, at 13:51, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we still want to support loading Seaside 3.2.0 in Pharo1.x ? >> Configuration management is getting overly complex _and_ some packages (Welcome, Rest, Slime, etc… are not being updated anymore for that platform). >> >> Opinions? > > I'm still on 1.3 but I'm probably the only one. I would be fine if the > configuration no longer supports 1.x and anybody who still wants to > use 1.x would be on this own. > > Cheers > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > seaside-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Ok, for now I did not explicitly remove those sections, but I will be working on a new configuration baseline and drop them there. Probably that's for 3.3 though. > > Btw, testContentsNotifying is failing since the latest changes. Fixed. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
In reply to this post by Johan Brichau-2
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Ok, for now I did not explicitly remove those sections, but I will be working on a new configuration baseline and drop them there. Probably that's for 3.3 though. > > Btw, testContentsNotifying is failing since the latest changes. > > I'll take a look at the failing swagger tests now I fixed some of them (mostly missing Metacello dependencies) but two still fail. I added some more debug info in case of failures (it could be that we rely on a not guaranteed method order) but it seems to me as if #version320: is running into a literal limit. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
I noticed… I just fixed those as well and we committed different versions.
I merged them and published latest one now. > On 24 Jul 2015, at 12:47, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Ok, for now I did not explicitly remove those sections, but I will be working on a new configuration baseline and drop them there. Probably that's for 3.3 though. >> >> Btw, testContentsNotifying is failing since the latest changes. >> >> I'll take a look at the failing swagger tests now > > I fixed some of them (mostly missing Metacello dependencies) but two > still fail. I added some more debug info in case of failures (it could > be that we rely on a not guaranteed method order) but it seems to me > as if #version320: is running into a literal limit. > > Cheers > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > seaside-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall
I split the method and committed Some packages are missing, so we need more. _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |