Hello all,
Is it reasonable to expect Squeak/Pharo with Seaside, and other tools to perform as follows: (1) Pharo image(s) run as service(s); the computer is (ab)used pretty much as an appliance; technicians are told to plug in the network cable, then turn on the box, and if all is well, it "just works". (2) most (Smalltalk) configuration tasks happen via a Seaside interface. (3) I realize that I can edit code through Seaside's halos, but I will sometimes want to interact graphically with the Squeak image; it will be doing other things beyond serving Seaside pages. I envision (please tell me if there are better ways) making a remote desktop (or similar) connection to the server, stopping the offending service, and restarting it as a desktop user to debug, save the changed image, exit, restart the service, and log out. Is this a SSH/VNC task, or is there a better way. Some things I have read appear to suggest that one can simply use VNC to attach to the running Squeak service and a GUI instantly appears??? That seems too slick to expect it to work. Do things change if one replaces Linux with Windows? I am trying to escape, but it will take some time to complete the transfer. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: [hidden email] Tel: (352) 846-1285 FAX: (352) 392-7029 _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> (1) Pharo image(s) run as service(s); the computer is (ab)used pretty
> much as an appliance; technicians are told to plug in the network cable, > then turn on the box, and if all is well, it "just works". That's already possible. > (2) most (Smalltalk) configuration tasks happen via a Seaside interface. What configuration tasks? If these are not yet available an interface could certainly be built. OmniBrowser and the XUL integration is also a possibility here. > (3) I realize that I can edit code through Seaside's halos, but I will > sometimes want to interact graphically with the Squeak image; it will be > doing other things beyond serving Seaside pages. I envision (please > tell me if there are better ways) making a remote desktop (or similar) > connection to the server, stopping the offending service, and restarting > it as a desktop user to debug, save the changed image, exit, restart the > service, and log out. OmniBrowser. > Is this a SSH/VNC task, or is there a better way. Some things I have > read appear to suggest that one can simply use VNC to attach to the > running Squeak service and a GUI instantly appears??? That seems too > slick to expect it to work. RemoteFrameBuffer is perfect to do that. Like this you start you image headless on the server, and use a VNC client to connect to the screen from anywhere. I use that on all my servers. > Do things change if one replaces Linux with Windows? I am trying to > escape, but it will take some time to complete the transfer. Linux is great for deployment. A long time ago I did some deployment on Windows servers. What's inside the image (e.g. RemoteFrameBuffer) works equally well. The host OS is not so cool ... Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 21:52 +0200, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> > (1) Pharo image(s) run as service(s); the computer is (ab)used pretty > > much as an appliance; technicians are told to plug in the network cable, > > then turn on the box, and if all is well, it "just works". > > That's already possible. > > > (2) most (Smalltalk) configuration tasks happen via a Seaside interface. > > What configuration tasks? If these are not yet available an interface > could certainly be built. OmniBrowser and the XUL integration is also > a possibility here. > > > (3) I realize that I can edit code through Seaside's halos, but I will > > sometimes want to interact graphically with the Squeak image; it will be > > doing other things beyond serving Seaside pages. I envision (please > > tell me if there are better ways) making a remote desktop (or similar) > > connection to the server, stopping the offending service, and restarting > > it as a desktop user to debug, save the changed image, exit, restart the > > service, and log out. > > OmniBrowser. > > > Is this a SSH/VNC task, or is there a better way. Some things I have > > read appear to suggest that one can simply use VNC to attach to the > > running Squeak service and a GUI instantly appears??? That seems too > > slick to expect it to work. > > RemoteFrameBuffer is perfect to do that. Like this you start you image > headless on the server, and use a VNC client to connect to the screen > from anywhere. I use that on all my servers. > module do a vnc connection. That could be cool for some situations where you just enter the https url of your admin site and connect from the browser image to the production image. But I don't know if the squeak module is able to connect on another port. Tunneling the vnc of port 80 would be some work and would destroy the benefit. Norbert > > Do things change if one replaces Linux with Windows? I am trying to > > escape, but it will take some time to complete the transfer. > > Linux is great for deployment. A long time ago I did some deployment > on Windows servers. What's inside the image (e.g. RemoteFrameBuffer) > works equally well. The host OS is not so cool ... > > Cheers, > Lukas > _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> > > Is this a SSH/VNC task, or is there a better way. Some things I have
> > > read appear to suggest that one can simply use VNC to attach to the > > > running Squeak service and a GUI instantly appears??? That seems too > > > slick to expect it to work. > > > > RemoteFrameBuffer is perfect to do that. Like this you start you image > > headless on the server, and use a VNC client to connect to the screen > > from anywhere. I use that on all my servers. > > > > Yes, me too. Do you think it would be possible to let the squeak browser > module do a vnc connection. That could be cool for some situations where > you just enter the https url of your admin site and connect from the > browser image to the production image. But I don't know if the squeak > module is able to connect on another port. Tunneling the vnc of port 80 > would be some work and would destroy the benefit. I don't understand what you mean? What is a module? There is a web-based application (WAScreenshot) included with Seaside that enables accessing the GUI of a headless image through the web. It is a bit slow (it essentially just displays a screenshot) and not very user-friendly (mouse clicks on the screenshot are forwarded to the image) though. If you use RemoteFrameBuffer (VNC) you are very likely tunneling through an SSH connection anyway. I guess nobody wants to keep an unencrypted VNC port open on their server. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 11:20 +0200, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> > > > Is this a SSH/VNC task, or is there a better way. Some things I have > > > > read appear to suggest that one can simply use VNC to attach to the > > > > running Squeak service and a GUI instantly appears??? That seems too > > > > slick to expect it to work. > > > > > > RemoteFrameBuffer is perfect to do that. Like this you start you image > > > headless on the server, and use a VNC client to connect to the screen > > > from anywhere. I use that on all my servers. > > > > > > > Yes, me too. Do you think it would be possible to let the squeak browser > > module do a vnc connection. That could be cool for some situations where > > you just enter the https url of your admin site and connect from the > > browser image to the production image. But I don't know if the squeak > > module is able to connect on another port. Tunneling the vnc of port 80 > > would be some work and would destroy the benefit. > > I don't understand what you mean? What is a module? > the browser. But I mean that. > There is a web-based application (WAScreenshot) included with Seaside > that enables accessing the GUI of a headless image through the web. It > is a bit slow (it essentially just displays a screenshot) and not very > user-friendly (mouse clicks on the screenshot are forwarded to the > image) though. > > If you use RemoteFrameBuffer (VNC) you are very likely tunneling > through an SSH connection anyway. I guess nobody wants to keep an > unencrypted VNC port open on their server. > it through http. Ok, forget it. Thanks! Norbert _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
>
> If you use RemoteFrameBuffer (VNC) you are very likely tunneling > through an SSH connection anyway. I guess nobody wants to keep an > unencrypted VNC port open on their server. > > Cheers, > Lukas > I'm using nx server from nomachine for remote desktop linux. It goes on ssh and do its magic noticeably fast. cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |