HI Tudor, i guess porting and updating SMx from the latest version
in CUIS, would be made around next week. This would give us: new Morph kernel, significantly simplified layout, basic widgets simplified and unified ( for example only one class for buttons) and anti-alised rounded corners for windows and buttons( Juan implemented this taking ideas from Morphic3, way better than the OS native widgets, just take a look at CUIS ). Then * Integrating Alain's editor state into the text morphs views shouldn't take more than one day. ( I believe Glamour only requires up to here). * When Ben releases Nautilus, we would have to port it to SMx. ( to have standard browsers) * Polymorph and SMx merge, would take quite a while, depending on the amount of people we get involved. So i dont know how much would it take to replace entirely Morphic with SMx, having all the features of Polymorph also. Highly depends on the people involved in this effort. But having a simple version of SMx, is feasible within 15 days . and then gradually add pieces till we can trash any Old-Morphic dependance. Fernando On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Fernando, > > These are good news. > > I am very interested in using this in Glamour. Just one question: What is the expected schedule? > > Cheers, > Doru > |
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote: > HI Tudor, i guess porting and updating SMx from the latest version > in CUIS, would be made around next week. > > This would give us: new Morph kernel, significantly simplified layout, > basic widgets simplified and unified ( for example only one class for > buttons) and anti-alised rounded corners for windows and buttons( Juan > implemented this taking ideas from Morphic3, way better than the OS > native widgets, just take a look at CUIS ). > > Then > > * Integrating Alain's editor state into the text morphs views > shouldn't take more than one day. > > ( I believe Glamour only requires up to here). fernando I do not think so. Glamour needs more. But we should start and see. > > * When Ben releases Nautilus, we would have to port it to SMx. ( to > have standard browsers) > * Polymorph and SMx merge, would take quite a while, depending on the > amount of people we get involved. > > So i dont know how much would it take to replace entirely Morphic with > SMx, having all the features of Polymorph also. Highly depends on the > people involved in this effort. > > But having a simple version of SMx, is feasible within 15 days . and > then gradually add pieces till we can trash any Old-Morphic > dependance. > > Fernando > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Fernando, >> >> These are good news. >> >> I am very interested in using this in Glamour. Just one question: What is the expected schedule? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> > |
Hi Fernando,
On 1 Apr 2011, at 20:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote: > >> HI Tudor, i guess porting and updating SMx from the latest version >> in CUIS, would be made around next week. >> >> This would give us: new Morph kernel, significantly simplified layout, >> basic widgets simplified and unified ( for example only one class for >> buttons) and anti-alised rounded corners for windows and buttons( Juan >> implemented this taking ideas from Morphic3, way better than the OS >> native widgets, just take a look at CUIS ). >> >> Then >> >> * Integrating Alain's editor state into the text morphs views >> shouldn't take more than one day. >> >> ( I believe Glamour only requires up to here). > > fernando I do not think so. Glamour needs more. > But we should start and see. Indeed. Glamour needs at least: - MorphTreeMorph - GeneralScrollPane or a replacement that has the ability of filling the space on one dimension and scroll on the other (like a finder on Mac OS) - TextMorph with keybindings customizable all the way, and with announcements sent for every little action - strong TabMorph with toolbar (I will send an announcement soon about the widget I have in Glamour) >> >> * When Ben releases Nautilus, we would have to port it to SMx. ( to >> have standard browsers) >> * Polymorph and SMx merge, would take quite a while, depending on the >> amount of people we get involved. >> >> So i dont know how much would it take to replace entirely Morphic with >> SMx, having all the features of Polymorph also. Highly depends on the >> people involved in this effort. >> >> But having a simple version of SMx, is feasible within 15 days . and >> then gradually add pieces till we can trash any Old-Morphic >> dependance. So, when will this happen then? :) I have some time now and I can offer some testing. Cheers, Doru >> Fernando >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi Fernando, >>> >>> These are good news. >>> >>> I am very interested in using this in Glamour. Just one question: What is the expected schedule? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Some battles are better lost than fought." |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |