Slime, status?

> On 19 Jan 2015, at 22:44, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> to my surprise I noticed that Grease Slime for testing
> code against certain rules is only enable for Pharo in
> ConfigurationOfGrease and Seaside Slime is only
> enabled for Pharo 1.4 in ConfigurationOfSeaside3.
>  Before I jump into it and enable the Slimes for Squeak
> (again?), I'd ask what the main reason is or has been to
> not support them in Squeak (for both Slimes) or newer
> Pharos (for Seaside Slime)?
>  Maybe I'm reading the configs wrong?
>
> Best
> -Tobias
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

> Johan
>
>> On 19 Jan 2015, at 22:44, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> to my surprise I noticed that Grease Slime for testing
>> code against certain rules is only enable for Pharo in
>> ConfigurationOfGrease and Seaside Slime is only
>> enabled for Pharo 1.4 in ConfigurationOfSeaside3.
>> Before I jump into it and enable the Slimes for Squeak
>> (again?), I'd ask what the main reason is or has been to
>> not support them in Squeak (for both Slimes) or newer
>> Pharos (for Seaside Slime)?
>> Maybe I'm reading the configs wrong?
>>
>> Best
>> -Tobias
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

> Hi Johan
>
>
> On 20.01.2015, at 07:28, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Tobias,
>>
>> Seaside-Slime is included in all versions of Pharo. It is in the #pharo section (hence: all versions).
>> There are issues with it in Pharo 3 though because of a bug in Pharo3 (cannot find the bug reference right now).
>>
>> Why it’s not available for Squeak: I guess they don’t work, but mostly because this was the case even before I started to update the configurations.
>>
>
> Thanks for the answer :)
> I apparently misread the Pharo section, but good to know it is included.
>
> I manually loaded the current Grease and Seaside Slime Packages and they load
> just fine.
>   Also, I tested them and they really seem to work well on a 4.5 image.

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Johan
>>
>>
>> On 20.01.2015, at 07:28, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Tobias,
>>>
>>> Seaside-Slime is included in all versions of Pharo. It is in the #pharo section (hence: all versions).
>>> There are issues with it in Pharo 3 though because of a bug in Pharo3 (cannot find the bug reference right now).
>>>
>>> Why it’s not available for Squeak: I guess they don’t work, but mostly because this was the case even before I started to update the configurations.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the answer :)
>> I apparently misread the Pharo section, but good to know it is included.
>>
>> I manually loaded the current Grease and Seaside Slime Packages and they load
>> just fine.
>>  Also, I tested them and they really seem to work well on a 4.5 image.
>
> Did you also test the OB integration?

> Hi,
>
> On 20.01.2015, at 17:14, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Hi Johan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20.01.2015, at 07:28, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tobias,
>>>>
>>>> Seaside-Slime is included in all versions of Pharo. It is in the #pharo section (hence: all versions).
>>>> There are issues with it in Pharo 3 though because of a bug in Pharo3 (cannot find the bug reference right now).
>>>>
>>>> Why it’s not available for Squeak: I guess they don’t work, but mostly because this was the case even before I started to update the configurations.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the answer :)
>>> I apparently misread the Pharo section, but good to know it is included.
>>>
>>> I manually loaded the current Grease and Seaside Slime Packages and they load
>>> just fine.
>>> Also, I tested them and they really seem to work well on a 4.5 image.
>>
>> Did you also test the OB integration?
>
> No I didn't.
> I use these rules via SwaLint.
> I should do that, tho. However, it'll take some
> time until I have a working OB image again :)