Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Slow Image

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Stephan Eggermont-3

Slow Image

Astartes wrote:

> Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows
> heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
>
> After a first rough test I think it happens after the "Delay" fixes
> from update 10287/10288
>
> Thx
> T.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007910.html
> [2]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007934.html

I don't know. Started at 12.48, and is still running at 14.33 :(

Stephan

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: Slow Image

I will give a try on mac.

On Apr 28, 2009, at 2:35 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Astartes wrote:
>> Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows
>> heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
>>
>> After a first rough test I think it happens after the "Delay" fixes
>> from update 10287/10288
>>
>> Thx
>> T.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007910.html
>> [2]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007934.html
>
> I don't know. Started at 12.48, and is still running at 14.33 :(
>
> Stephan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Damien Cassou

Re: Slow Image

In reply to this post by Stephan Eggermont-3

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows
>> heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?

I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293.

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Michael Rueger-6

Re: Slow Image

Damien Cassou wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows
>>> heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
>
> I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293.

does someone have a somewhat smaller load sequence we could use to
benchmark the difference? Something that runs in a few minutes?

Michael

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Damien Cassou

Re: Slow Image

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Michael Rueger <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Damien Cassou wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows
>>>> heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
>>
>> I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293.
>
> does someone have a somewhat smaller load sequence we could use to
> benchmark the difference? Something that runs in a few minutes?

20 minutes on my Ubuntu/Linux 9.04

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project