So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
Locked
So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
 
|
>> But now we should go beta=releaseCandidate1
>> >> >No, I don't agree. That's not the same. One thing is beta and another thing >is a release candidate. While I appreciate that Stef wants to push out 1.1. quickly since there are so many good things in this release we should clearly start to build a beta, test it and then (based on these results) have a first release candidate. Pharo core is stable - but is pharo-dev already? We really should have a beta. We all know: Pharo = core + packages >Imagine you are going to download a software which is in RELEASE CANDIDATE >and has a lot of problems and bugs....is not good for marketing. especially if the website says: "Pharo is an attractive platform to build and deploy mission critical Smalltalk applications." So +1 for Mariano here Mariano: what is the state of building a dev image from the core for 1.1.? Last time I tried the ConfigurationOfPharo with 1.1. I run into the condense changes problem - which I thing was fixed now. Thx T. -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
|
|
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote: >> But now we should go beta=releaseCandidate1 It should load perfectly and work good. But try in latest core (at least 11360). And yes, the condenseChanges takes a life (a lot of time). So, don't kill the image. It is not freeze. Just take a beer and wait :) Thx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
|
|
In reply to this post by Torsten Bergmann
ok you won :)
so we will go beta. Now we will not open 1.2 right now because we can just take the time to do 1.1 nice and there are plenty of stuff to do around 1.1 and to prepare in the calm 1.1 Stef On May 17, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >>> But now we should go beta=releaseCandidate1 >>> >>> >> No, I don't agree. That's not the same. One thing is beta and another thing >> is a release candidate. > > While I appreciate that Stef wants to push out 1.1. quickly > since there are so many good things in this release we > should clearly start to build a beta, test it and then > (based on these results) have a first release candidate. > > Pharo core is stable - but is pharo-dev already? We really > should have a beta. We all know: Pharo = core + packages > >> Imagine you are going to download a software which is in RELEASE CANDIDATE >> and has a lot of problems and bugs....is not good for marketing. > > especially if the website says: "Pharo is an attractive platform to build and deploy mission critical Smalltalk applications." > > So +1 for Mariano here > > Mariano: what is the state of building a dev image from > the core for 1.1.? Last time I tried the ConfigurationOfPharo with 1.1. > I run into the condense changes problem - which I thing was fixed now. > > Thx > T. > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
|
|
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: ok you won :) heehhhee Now we will not open 1.2 right now because we can just take the time to do 1.1 nice and there are plenty of stuff to do I agree :) Perfect. What I wouldn't do in core 1.1 now is to add new functionality. Let's concentrate in making pharo 1.1 better, tests green, etc. New functionality should wait for Pharo 1.2 (which will be not open right now) Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
|
|
In reply to this post by Torsten Bergmann
> Mariano: what is the state of building a dev image from
> the core for 1.1.? Last time I tried the ConfigurationOfPharo with 1.1. > I run into the condense changes problem - which I thing was fixed now. You can easily build a Pharo1.1 from a core. No warning and no deprecation. It just takes time. Moose loads in it. Cheers, Alexandre _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)
|
|
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
> Now we will not open 1.2 right now because we can just take the time to do 1.1 nice and there are plenty of stuff to do
> around 1.1 and to prepare in the calm 1.1 Good decision. We are not racing, but producing quality. Alexandre _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |