Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Some notes we took during our experience

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

9 messages Options

Stéphane Ducasse

Some notes we took during our experience

Hi

marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.

Here are some extra notes I took

- PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
- MethodReference could be closer to CompiledMethod (to avoid cycle with tools when in fact people
just wanted to report aCompiled method list and return a methodReference list).
- Services -> split into Services-Morphic and Services-Core -> but services should be removed for now

- Symbol could has its own scanning function (isLiteralSymbol) to avoid to depend on Scanner
- URL should be replaced by URI
- WordArrayForSegment -> ImageSegment
- FilePackage -> Tools
- TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.

Stef

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Nicolas Cellier

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

2010/1/7 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:

> Hi
>
> marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.
>
> Here are some extra notes I took
>
> - PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
> - MethodReference could be closer to CompiledMethod (to avoid cycle with tools when in fact people
> just wanted to report aCompiled method list and return a methodReference list).
> - Services -> split into Services-Morphic and Services-Core -> but services should be removed for now
>
> - Symbol could has its own scanning function (isLiteralSymbol) to avoid to depend on Scanner

Anyway, st-80 did have support for several Compiler, so asking to
Symbol rather than Compiler/parser was a bad idea.

Nicolas

> - URL should be replaced by URI
> - WordArrayForSegment -> ImageSegment
> - FilePackage -> Tools
> - TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.
>
> Stef
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.

Here are some extra notes I took

- PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
- MethodReference could be closer to CompiledMethod (to avoid cycle with tools when in fact people
just wanted to report aCompiled method list and return a methodReference list).
- Services -> split into Services-Morphic and Services-Core -> but services should be removed for now

- Symbol could has its own scanning function (isLiteralSymbol) to avoid to depend on Scanner
- URL should be replaced by URI
- WordArrayForSegment -> ImageSegment

I will try to look for this. I have several things in my ImageSegment to-do list :)

- FilePackage -> Tools
- TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.

Stef

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier

>
>> Hi
>>
>> marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.
>>
>> Here are some extra notes I took
>>
>> - PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
>> - MethodReference could be closer to CompiledMethod (to avoid cycle with tools when in fact people
>> just wanted to report aCompiled method list and return a methodReference list).
>> - Services -> split into Services-Morphic and Services-Core -> but services should be removed for now
>>
>> - Symbol could has its own scanning function (isLiteralSymbol) to avoid to depend on Scanner
>
> Anyway, st-80 did have support for several Compiler, so asking to
> Symbol rather than Compiler/parser was a bad idea.

we were discussing about that with marcus.
The problem is that if we want to remove Scanner or Compiler from a kernel
then relying on it to determine if a symbol should be printed #hkjhk or #'hkj kjkj'
is a problem.

>
> Nicolas
>
>> - URL should be replaced by URI
>> - WordArrayForSegment -> ImageSegment
>> - FilePackage -> Tools
>> - TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Alain Plantec-4

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
> Hi
>
> marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.
>
> Here are some extra notes I took
>
> - PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
>
sure, its days are counted ;-)
Alain
> Stef
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

>>
>> - PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
>>
> sure, its days are counted ;-)

heheheh (kind of evil laugh with echo).
Even if the PreferenceBrowserMorph was a good guy and I was happy to include it in 3.9
to replace the old one. So it served its time.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.

Here are some extra notes I took

- PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
- MethodReference could be closer to CompiledMethod (to avoid cycle with tools when in fact people
just wanted to report aCompiled method list and return a methodReference list).
- Services -> split into Services-Morphic and Services-Core -> but services should be removed for now

- Symbol could has its own scanning function (isLiteralSymbol) to avoid to depend on Scanner
- URL should be replaced by URI
- WordArrayForSegment -> ImageSegment

Would you rather WordArrayForSegment to be in the package 'System-Object Storage' where it is ImageSegment right now than being in Collections-Arrayed ?

I will try to look for this. I have several things in my ImageSegment to-do list :)

- FilePackage -> Tools
- TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.

Stef

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

Yes

>
> Would you rather WordArrayForSegment to be in the package 'System-Object Storage' where it is ImageSegment right now than being in Collections-Arrayed ?
>
>
>
> I will try to look for this. I have several things in my ImageSegment to-do list :)
>
> - FilePackage -> Tools
> - TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.
>
> Stef
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: Some notes we took during our experience

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

marcus jannik and me got fun and fixed some cycles.

Here are some extra notes I took

- PreferenceBrowserMorph and friends should be removed.
- MethodReference could be closer to CompiledMethod (to avoid cycle with tools when in fact people
just wanted to report aCompiled method list and return a methodReference list).
- Services -> split into Services-Morphic and Services-Core -> but services should be removed for now

- Symbol could has its own scanning function (isLiteralSymbol) to avoid to depend on Scanner
- URL should be replaced by URI
- WordArrayForSegment -> ImageSegment

Done in 11157 :)

Cheers

Mariano

- FilePackage -> Tools
- TextDiffBuilder -> in its own package.

Stef

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project