I was able to get a very recent image from the Windows box and it seems to work correctly after re-saving on Linux. I am not sure exactly what I would lose by stopping at this point, hence my next question.
Not knowing whether the change log from the broken image is at fault, I hesitate to use it as the basis for future work. If I understand how to recover lost changes, that is exactly what I would do: use it as the change log for the working image and recover changes into it. Is there another, perhaps safer, way to do that?
Bill
________________________________________
From:
[hidden email] [
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K [
[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 3:24 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: [Pharo-project] Something wrong with changes?
I might have a corrupt change log. It is not particularly large, so I doubt it is size related. The problem is that I am not getting temporary names (lots of t1, t2, ... where there should be meaningful names). I recently copied the image from Linux to Windows and back; the timing is interesting. I also sometimes find that Ubuntu takes a LONG time to complete writes to flash sticks and wonder whether that might be an accident waiting to happen??
I have a backup from not quite a week ago and will check the image on the Windows box. Between the two of them and some recovery, I can probably be back in action quickly. It is also time for me to move from 1.1 RC2 to release anyway.
Does any of this (possible changes woes and/or problems moving between Linux and Windows) sound familiar?
Bill
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project