Hi
In MVP the presenter has direct access to the Model and (of course it means that the Model API is fixed) but I wonder if this would not help us simplify Spec. Model <---- presenter <----> View What do you think? Stef |
> In MVP the presenter has direct access to the Model and (of course it means that the Model API is fixed) Why would that be true? You can plug the necessary behavior of how the model can be accessed, so no need to fix the Model's API. After all the actual model will vary from user the user, so the API can't be fixed. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:39 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi |
I did not mean that Model :) I meant the relationship with View. Stef
|
Hi. I am sure I saw model inside presenter in Spec. It was one of reason why presenter is better name. We had Model model. Now it is Presenter model. 15 мая 2016 г. 10:29 пользователь "stepharo" <[hidden email]> написал:
|
Le 15/5/16 à 10:37, Denis Kudriashov a
écrit :
I do not know. In the spec array there is from time to time a reference to model. The interpreter was checking from model (last time I read it before ben' refactoring) Now this is too early so that I'm clear :)
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |