Spec website: nice!
Locked
12
12
 
|
|
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
Wow, this is seriously cool & professional, really. Very well done.
This really raises the bar for presenting similar projects. Great work, Ben ! PS: And an .st domain name is not cheap ;-) On 28 Feb 2014, at 10:59, [hidden email] wrote: > Didn't knew about it and came across by looking at the GitHub project for Spec. > > http://spec.st/ > > Phil |
|
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
Yes, this is cool :) Nice work.
Benjamin, why don't you do a ConfigurationOfSpec with an url of 'github://SpecForPharo/spec:master' ? Thierry Le 28/02/2014 10:59, [hidden email] a écrit : > Didn't knew about it and came across by looking at the GitHub project > for Spec. > > http://spec.st/ > > Phil -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 |
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
You blew up my surprise :)
It is still work in progress that’s why I did not announce it before (you know, to not announce something before it’s finished :P)
Ben |
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
In reply to this post by Goubier Thierry
Because I did not knew about it until yesterday :)
I will have a look next week :P (or if you want to submit a PR before LOL)
Ben On 28 Feb 2014, at 11:10, Goubier Thierry <[hidden email]> wrote: Yes, this is cool :) Nice work. |
|
|
Le 28/02/2014 11:26, Benjamin a écrit : > Because I did not knew about it until yesterday :) Took me a while to understand that too :) Found the code when hacking support for gitfiletree in Metacello. > I will have a look next week :P > (or if you want to submit a PR before LOL) Hum, maybe over the week-end then. By the way, your link to github is broken :) Thierry > Ben > > On 28 Feb 2014, at 11:10, Goubier Thierry <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > >> Yes, this is cool :) Nice work. >> >> Benjamin, why don't you do a ConfigurationOfSpec with an url of >> 'github://SpecForPharo/spec:master' ? >> >> Thierry >> >> Le 28/02/2014 10:59, [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> a >> écrit : >>> Didn't knew about it and came across by looking at the GitHub project >>> for Spec. >>> >>> http://spec.st/ >>> >>> Phil >> >> -- >> Thierry Goubier >> CEA list >> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués >> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex >> France >> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >> > -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 |
|
|
Hi Benjamin It's very cool ! The website and the documentation are very pleasant and well presented. Perhaps you could add links to the Pharo web site and the RMoD team ? Olivier ;-) 2014-02-28 11:34 GMT+01:00 Goubier Thierry <[hidden email]>:
|
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
In reply to this post by Goubier Thierry
On 28 Feb 2014, at 11:34, Goubier Thierry <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes I renamed the association :) That’s one of the reason I did not publicly announce it… Ben
|
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
In reply to this post by Olivier Auverlot
Yes, there is a “thanks” page missing.
Again, the website is not ready for public :)
Ben On 28 Feb 2014, at 13:05, olivier auverlot <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
|
definitely a very beautiful and well designed website. Well done Benjamin. Looks very professional yet it has a personal touch. I love it. Quite a surprise , I did not see this coming :)
Talking about websites I am curious, is there a plan to bring Spec to Javascript side , in particular , Amber ? I have seen that Amber has it as a goal, but I was curious how much of a serious goal it is. I think it would be very cool if Spec could leverage HTML/CSS/JS GUI wise.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
On 28 Feb 2014, at 13:40, kilon alios <[hidden email]> wrote:
We proposed it as a GSoC project. But as you know ESUG was not selected as partner. With Nicolas we are discussing since a while about how to move Spec on Amber. The battle plan is quite set up :) Now, we just need man power (as usual)
Nicolas is now developing a widget framework for Amber (Moka). The goal is to finish that, and then to plug Spec on top of it. We would like to have it for Amber 1.0 (but we do not know when it would be :P ) Ben
|
|
|
Nice website!
Well done guys! Esteban A. Maringolo 2014-02-28 9:47 GMT-03:00 Benjamin <[hidden email]>: > On 28 Feb 2014, at 13:40, kilon alios <[hidden email]> wrote: > > definitely a very beautiful and well designed website. Well done Benjamin. > Looks very professional yet it has a personal touch. I love it. > > > Thank you :) > > Talking about websites I am curious, is there a plan to bring Spec to > Javascript side , in particular , Amber ? > > > We proposed it as a GSoC project. > But as you know ESUG was not selected as partner. > > With Nicolas we are discussing since a while about how to move Spec on > Amber. > The battle plan is quite set up :) > > Now, we just need man power (as usual) > > I have seen that Amber has it as a goal, but I was curious how much of a > serious goal it is. I think it would be very cool if Spec could leverage > HTML/CSS/JS GUI wise. > > > Nicolas is now developing a widget framework for Amber (Moka). > The goal is to finish that, and then to plug Spec on top of it. > > We would like to have it for Amber 1.0 > (but we do not know when it would be :P ) > > Ben > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Benjamin > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Yes, there is a "thanks" page missing. >> >> >> Again, the website is not ready for public :) >> >> Ben >> >> On 28 Feb 2014, at 13:05, olivier auverlot <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Benjamin >> >> It's very cool ! The website and the documentation are very pleasant and >> well presented. Perhaps you could add links to the Pharo web site and the >> RMoD team ? >> >> Olivier ;-) >> >> >> 2014-02-28 11:34 GMT+01:00 Goubier Thierry <[hidden email]>: >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 28/02/2014 11:26, Benjamin a écrit : >>> >>>> Because I did not knew about it until yesterday :) >>> >>> >>> Took me a while to understand that too :) Found the code when hacking >>> support for gitfiletree in Metacello. >>> >>> >>>> I will have a look next week :P >>>> (or if you want to submit a PR before LOL) >>> >>> >>> Hum, maybe over the week-end then. By the way, your link to github is >>> broken :) >>> >>> Thierry >>> >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> On 28 Feb 2014, at 11:10, Goubier Thierry <[hidden email] >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, this is cool :) Nice work. >>>>> >>>>> Benjamin, why don't you do a ConfigurationOfSpec with an url of >>>>> 'github://SpecForPharo/spec:master' ? >>>>> >>>>> Thierry >>>>> >>>>> Le 28/02/2014 10:59, [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> a >>>>> >>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Didn't knew about it and came across by looking at the GitHub project >>>>>> for Spec. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://spec.st/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Phil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thierry Goubier >>>>> CEA list >>>>> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués >>>>> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex >>>>> France >>>>> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thierry Goubier >>> CEA list >>> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués >>> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex >>> France >>> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Benjamin Van Ryseghem (Pharo)
I see, thanks for the information Never heard of Moka, I will do some digging , sounds exciting. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
|
|
In reply to this post by Benjamin Van Ryseghem (Pharo)
Ben, congrat's on this Spec site I especially liked what I read at On 28 February 2014 06:25, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
|
|
This is really good and very well done and can only get better over time.
I'd like to see a complete API and description of every Spec Model added to the site and there needs to be multiple examples so that the whole range of widgets and interface types are shown. Brilliant start, though. |
|
|
Hi Guys, Every so often I spend a few minutes taking a look a Pharo or Squeak. I can see much improvement but before long I find something that does not work. 1) I'm a Widows user and there is no keyboard mapping for switching the alt to control keys 2) I tried the debugger and the "Add breakpoint" menu command appears to corrupt the stepping into behavior. 3) Next I tried the new Spec website. Should the code on the Quick Start page read. (ListModel new items: Smalltalk allClasses) openWithSpec. Thanks, Steve |
|
|
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:01 PM, S. Garth Holland <[hidden email]> wrote:
So? Alt on Windows replaces Cmd on OSX for Doits, Printits etc. Ctrl-X,V,C on Win matches Cmd-X,V,C on OSX.
Adding self halt works nicer as the add/remove breakpoint basically does that behind the scenes.
|
Re: Spec website: nice!
|
|
In reply to this post by kmo
I would love too :)
But as always it takes time. I try to do my best to offer an easy to read yet useful documentation. Let’s hope we can make it :) Ben On 28 Feb 2014, at 19:54, kmo <[hidden email]> wrote: This is really good and very well done and can only get better over time. |
|
|
In reply to this post by Garth Holland
Each time you report an issue, "working yet" will get there much faster for you. Thanks for reporting these.
I'm a Windows 7 user and have no problems in my workflow - but I don't know if thats just because I've adapted to the system-as-it-is or otherwise. Could you be more specific about what behaviour you want from particular alt/control keys? Nice find. Actually I've never used it but I've reproduced the issue and opened a case for it. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/edit/13019 You can sign up at pharo.fogbugz.com to subscribe to the case. Anything else that you've found?
|
|
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
1) I'm a Widows user and there is no keyboard mapping for switching the alt to control keys
So? Alt on Windows replaces Cmd on OSX for Doits, Printits etc. Ctrl-X,V,C on Win matches Cmd-X,V,C on OSX. Control x,c,v,f,s all work as expected. For consistency, I would like control p to print, control i to inspect, control e to explore, and control d to doit. 2) I tried the debugger and the "Add breakpoint" menu command appears to corrupt the stepping into behavior. Adding self halt works nicer as the add/remove breakpoint basically does that behind the scenes. Using the "Add breakpoint" menu item feels more lightweight and does not affect the version history. |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |