Speed of Amber?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Speed of Amber?

Guido Stepken

After Google has made significant advantages in jitting Javascript code to register optimized Intel machine code and simple stack based ARM code, i am missing some benchmarks. How fast can Amber be, how much code optimisation is possible? Still V8 jitter is not MP ! :-(

regards, Guido Stepken

Am 15.01.2012 22:43 schrieb "Stefan Krecher" <[hidden email]>:

Hi,
My personal amber-fork on github contains an amber-server for package-persistence to be run on node.js - persistence is made via a minimalistic amber-mongodb-binding. Are you looking for something like that?
Regards,
Stefan

--
sent from my android-phone

Am 15.01.2012 19:33 schrieb "leonsmith" <[hidden email]>:
Hi, I'm curious what our options are for persistence of Objects in
Amber. Since they are going to be used from node.js, JS and Amber. Is
there a way to do this (Persist Objects) on a massive multi-user
system ?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Speed of Amber?

Nicolas Petton
There's a Benchfib package in Amber.

There's some inlining done at compile time, now it's just a few
speculative inlinings, Amber could be more optimized :)

Cheers,
Nico

On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 22:56 +0100, Guido Stepken wrote:

> After Google has made significant advantages in jitting Javascript
> code to register optimized Intel machine code and simple stack based
> ARM code, i am missing some benchmarks. How fast can Amber be, how
> much code optimisation is possible? Still V8 jitter is not MP ! :-(
>
> regards, Guido Stepken
>
> Am 15.01.2012 22:43 schrieb "Stefan Krecher"
> <[hidden email]>:
>         Hi,
>         My personal amber-fork on github contains an amber-server for
>         package-persistence to be run on node.js - persistence is made
>         via a minimalistic amber-mongodb-binding. Are you looking for
>         something like that?
>         Regards,
>         Stefan
>        
>         --
>         sent from my android-phone
>        
>         Am 15.01.2012 19:33 schrieb "leonsmith"
>         <[hidden email]>:
>                 Hi, I'm curious what our options are for persistence
>                 of Objects in
>                 Amber. Since they are going to be used from node.js,
>                 JS and Amber. Is
>                 there a way to do this (Persist Objects) on a massive
>                 multi-user
>                 system ?