I just tried to start a SM Package loader which issued a dnu. Is it my image
or is ImageSegment broken? Is SM deprecated? It seems so in the official squeak distribution... _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Hi
> I just tried to start a SM Package loader which issued a dnu. could you send the stack? > Is it my image or is ImageSegment broken? ImageSegment was full of etoy hacks so it may happen that we break it. Or that we break its etoy friendliness. > Is SM deprecated? Yes or at least we did not check it. Our intention was not to deprecated but we should focus on MC. > It seems so in the official squeak distribution... Deprecated? I do not know. Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Markus Fritsche
On Apr 18, 2009, at 20:18 , Markus Fritsche wrote: > I just tried to start a SM Package loader which issued a dnu. Is it > my image > or is ImageSegment broken? > > Is SM deprecated? It seems so in the official squeak distribution... Our plan is to remove SM from Pharo core and treat it as an external package (IIRC Keith already provided means to load it). Adrian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
yes so this is still interesting to know whether it is broken as an
external package. On Apr 19, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > On Apr 18, 2009, at 20:18 , Markus Fritsche wrote: > >> I just tried to start a SM Package loader which issued a dnu. Is it >> my image >> or is ImageSegment broken? >> >> Is SM deprecated? It seems so in the official squeak distribution... > > Our plan is to remove SM from Pharo core and treat it as an external > package (IIRC Keith already provided means to load it). > > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> yes so this is still interesting to know whether it is broken as an > external package. I can take a look later tonight. I tried showing Pharo to a friend here and noticed it was broken. I think it may be the issue I fixed earlier - perhaps just not put into Pharo. regards, Göran _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Thansk goran.
If you can make sure that squeakMap is working as an external package this is great. This is not our purpose to consciously break it (as we are doing with etoy and friends). Stef On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Göran Krampe wrote: > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> yes so this is still interesting to know whether it is broken as an >> external package. > > I can take a look later tonight. I tried showing Pharo to a friend > here > and noticed it was broken. I think it may be the issue I fixed > earlier - > perhaps just not put into Pharo. > > regards, Göran > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |