Can anyone give an update on the status of
Pharo for Raspberry pi? |
Hi,
It is a vm issue, non a pharo issue. and AFAIK, Pavel had a StackVM running (probably some missing plugins, thought), with a Pharo 1.4 inside. best, Esteban On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Can anyone give an update on the status of > Pharo for Raspberry pi? > > |
It works with 1.4
http://forum.world.st/Pharo-2-0-on-Raspberry-Pi-tt4656486.html On 30 Jan 2013, at 12:44, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > It is a vm issue, non a pharo issue. > and AFAIK, Pavel had a StackVM running (probably some missing plugins, thought), with a Pharo 1.4 inside. > > best, > Esteban > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Can anyone give an update on the status of >> Pharo for Raspberry pi? >> > |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Hi,
it was only a SqueakVM, I had no luck with compilation of StackVM for it but it is a more general problem of VM development. We simply do not have any StackVM for general platform. I suppose that if you take StackVM and you will make it to run on 64bit Linux (without any assembler or additional 32bit libraries), then you will be able to compile it for RPi too. Cheers, -- Pavel On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > It is a vm issue, non a pharo issue. > and AFAIK, Pavel had a StackVM running (probably some missing plugins, thought), with a Pharo 1.4 inside. > > best, > Esteban > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Can anyone give an update on the status of >> Pharo for Raspberry pi? >> >> > > |
oops!
another item into the infinite-todo :) Esteban On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > it was only a SqueakVM, I had no luck with compilation of StackVM for > it but it is a more general problem of VM development. We simply do > not have any StackVM for general platform. I suppose that if you take > StackVM and you will make it to run on 64bit Linux (without any > assembler or additional 32bit libraries), then you will be able to > compile it for RPi too. > > > Cheers, > -- Pavel > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It is a vm issue, non a pharo issue. >> and AFAIK, Pavel had a StackVM running (probably some missing plugins, thought), with a Pharo 1.4 inside. >> >> best, >> Esteban >> >> On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Can anyone give an update on the status of >>> Pharo for Raspberry pi? >>> >>> >> >> > |
not a problem if it will be placed on top ;-)
-- Pavel On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > oops! > another item into the infinite-todo :) > > Esteban > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> it was only a SqueakVM, I had no luck with compilation of StackVM for >> it but it is a more general problem of VM development. We simply do >> not have any StackVM for general platform. I suppose that if you take >> StackVM and you will make it to run on 64bit Linux (without any >> assembler or additional 32bit libraries), then you will be able to >> compile it for RPi too. >> >> >> Cheers, >> -- Pavel >> >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It is a vm issue, non a pharo issue. >>> and AFAIK, Pavel had a StackVM running (probably some missing plugins, thought), with a Pharo 1.4 inside. >>> >>> best, >>> Esteban >>> >>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Can anyone give an update on the status of >>>> Pharo for Raspberry pi? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Pharo 2.0 does not seem to work on a standard Squeak interpreter VM any more.
Can anyone explain why? I suspect it might be something in the image startup code, because Pharo 2.0 does work on Cog (from Eliot's site), and AFIK there should be little functional difference between Cog and interpreter VM aside from VM parameters that might be getting tested at image startup. Thanks, Dave On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:04:35PM +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > oops! > another item into the infinite-todo :) > > Esteban > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > it was only a SqueakVM, I had no luck with compilation of StackVM for > > it but it is a more general problem of VM development. We simply do > > not have any StackVM for general platform. I suppose that if you take > > StackVM and you will make it to run on 64bit Linux (without any > > assembler or additional 32bit libraries), then you will be able to > > compile it for RPi too. > > > > > > Cheers, > > -- Pavel > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It is a vm issue, non a pharo issue. > >> and AFAIK, Pavel had a StackVM running (probably some missing plugins, thought), with a Pharo 1.4 inside. > >> > >> best, > >> Esteban > >> > >> On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >>> Can anyone give an update on the status of > >>> Pharo for Raspberry pi? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |