Store and RB Bugs when subClassing TreeView.

Hi

Whenever I subclass TreeView I end up with 2 Bugs.

1) Subclass TreeView or Win7TreeView.

2) Go to comment.

BOUM !!!!!

3) Publish your code to your store.

BOUM !!!!!

I already reported on this earlier with no reply.

Please be so kind as to take this as  BUGS.

Kind regards,

@+Maarten,

Dear Georg,

This is 7.8.1. nc, I was subclassing from UI.Win7MultiSelectionTreeView

I just got around it by adding a class method to MultiSelectionTreeView.

comment

^'Hi'

Regards,

Maarten,

-----Original Message-----
From: "Georg Heeg" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, 30 April, 2012 13:34
To: [hidden email], "'VWNC'" <[hidden email]>
Subject: AW: [vwnc] Store and RB Bugs when subClassing TreeView.

Dear Niall,

Thank you for your interest.
The TreeView subclassing problem arose with earlier versions of the Windows7 Look and Feel loaded. I overcame it by adding a method comment in TreeView. At the time my system was still dépendant on the VistaLook and feel I started. Since I got away with the VistaLook and while using the latest Windows7 L&F package the problem is gone.

To come back to the Glorp thing, I still don't think this is a bug, although I seem to have differences in behaviour between Oracle and Postgres. I was hoping for Alan to give me some inside Glorp tip to avoid the Poxy behaviour on an Object which remains somewhat misunderstood.

I can have a lot of data behind a mouseclick so I have to be very carefull in making this available.

Bes regards,

Maarten,


-----Original Message-----
From: "Niall Ross" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2012 22:17
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "Georg Heeg" <[hidden email]>, "'VWNC'" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [vwnc] Store and RB Bugs when subClassing TreeView.



Dear Marten,
I've just subclassed TreeView in 7.8, 7.8.1 and 7.9 - by doing New
Class ... in RB with TreeView selected. In each case, the RB opens on
the new classes' comment, and I can edit it and return to it without
problems.

Have I misunderstood your post? If not, can you give more information
on what you are seeing.

(BTW, I've also noted your Glorp post and it is being looked at. If you
can contrive any break showing where the query is being repeatedly
invoked, that would help.)

Yours faithfully
Niall Ross