[Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Uko2
Dear Pharoers,

I kindly ask you to participate in the QualityAssistant mini-survey: http://rio.inf.usi.ch/survey/index.php/818331.
It will take only a few minutes of your time (or less), and will give us a better understanding of how QualityAssistant is currently used and how to improve it.

Cheers!
Yuriy
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Mariano Martinez Peck
OK Done. 
Where I can see the answers now?  :)  I put I didn't know many of the features (I use it 99% of the time in Nautilus) and I do want to know now!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear Pharoers,

I kindly ask you to participate in the QualityAssistant mini-survey: http://rio.inf.usi.ch/survey/index.php/818331.
It will take only a few minutes of your time (or less), and will give us a better understanding of how QualityAssistant is currently used and how to improve it.

Cheers!
Yuriy



--
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Damien Cassou-2

Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> writes:

> OK Done.
> Where I can see the answers now?  :)  I put I didn't know many of the
> features (I use it 99% of the time in Nautilus) and I do want to know now!

I agree, where can we get information about the not-so-visible features?

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Uko2
Hi, they are described here:  https://github.com/Uko/QualityAssistant#actions

Mariano also reported that on Pharo 4 some actions are missing. I am investigating that.

Yuriy


On 14 Sep 2015, at 15:58, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote:


Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> writes:

OK Done.
Where I can see the answers now?  :)  I put I didn't know many of the
features (I use it 99% of the time in Nautilus) and I do want to know now!

I agree, where can we get information about the not-so-visible features?

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Pharo-users] [Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Mariano Martinez Peck
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Hi Yuriy,

Another thing I cannot see in the documentation is about ban. To me is really important how is persisted the banning. 
How do you prevent the banning from being lost when I take a new image? Can I export bans to fuel and re import in another image? 
Some time ago when there was the manifiesto classes, the banning was stored there, and so such class could be stored in monticello as part of your code, which was a nice idea. But at the same time, it's hard to keep a banning since you refactor... so..that's another question..do you do something with banning upon certain refactors?

Thanks!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Mariano,

thanks for participating! You can read about the features here: https://github.com/Uko/QualityAssistant#actions

If something is not clear please let me know, so I can improve.

On 14 Sep 2015, at 15:21, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

OK Done. 
Where I can see the answers now?  :)  I put I didn't know many of the features (I use it 99% of the time in Nautilus) and I do want to know now!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear Pharoers,

I kindly ask you to participate in the QualityAssistant mini-survey: http://rio.inf.usi.ch/survey/index.php/818331.
It will take only a few minutes of your time (or less), and will give us a better understanding of how QualityAssistant is currently used and how to improve it.

Cheers!
Yuriy



--




--
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Pharo-users] [Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Uko2
I’ve downloaded a fresh Pharo 4 image and opened browser at: Object>>#at:put:

Looking at it should show you:

If you don’t see the “tools” and “cross” icons, then something strange is going on. In this case, can you send me the image that you are using?

Also the “ban" is described as “skipping” in doc. I forgot to update it.

Uko

On 14 Sep 2015, at 16:20, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Yuriy,

Another thing I cannot see in the documentation is about ban. To me is really important how is persisted the banning. 
How do you prevent the banning from being lost when I take a new image? Can I export bans to fuel and re import in another image? 
Some time ago when there was the manifiesto classes, the banning was stored there, and so such class could be stored in monticello as part of your code, which was a nice idea. But at the same time, it's hard to keep a banning since you refactor... so..that's another question..do you do something with banning upon certain refactors?

Thanks!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Mariano,

thanks for participating! You can read about the features here: https://github.com/Uko/QualityAssistant#actions

If something is not clear please let me know, so I can improve.

On 14 Sep 2015, at 15:21, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

OK Done. 
Where I can see the answers now?  :)  I put I didn't know many of the features (I use it 99% of the time in Nautilus) and I do want to know now!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear Pharoers,

I kindly ask you to participate in the QualityAssistant mini-survey: http://rio.inf.usi.ch/survey/index.php/818331.
It will take only a few minutes of your time (or less), and will give us a better understanding of how QualityAssistant is currently used and how to improve it.

Cheers!
Yuriy



--




--

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Pharo-users] [Survey] QualityAssistant experience mini-survey

Mariano Martinez Peck
OK...I see some of those. Look attached screenshot. 

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
I’ve downloaded a fresh Pharo 4 image and opened browser at: Object>>#at:put:

Looking at it should show you:

If you don’t see the “tools” and “cross” icons, then something strange is going on. In this case, can you send me the image that you are using?

Also the “ban" is described as “skipping” in doc. I forgot to update it.

Uko

On 14 Sep 2015, at 16:20, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Yuriy,

Another thing I cannot see in the documentation is about ban. To me is really important how is persisted the banning. 
How do you prevent the banning from being lost when I take a new image? Can I export bans to fuel and re import in another image? 
Some time ago when there was the manifiesto classes, the banning was stored there, and so such class could be stored in monticello as part of your code, which was a nice idea. But at the same time, it's hard to keep a banning since you refactor... so..that's another question..do you do something with banning upon certain refactors?

Thanks!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Mariano,

thanks for participating! You can read about the features here: https://github.com/Uko/QualityAssistant#actions

If something is not clear please let me know, so I can improve.

On 14 Sep 2015, at 15:21, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:

OK Done. 
Where I can see the answers now?  :)  I put I didn't know many of the features (I use it 99% of the time in Nautilus) and I do want to know now!


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear Pharoers,

I kindly ask you to participate in the QualityAssistant mini-survey: http://rio.inf.usi.ch/survey/index.php/818331.
It will take only a few minutes of your time (or less), and will give us a better understanding of how QualityAssistant is currently used and how to improve it.

Cheers!
Yuriy



--




--




--

Screen Shot 2015-09-14 at 12.06.29 PM.png (133K) Download Attachment