Swazoo+SCGI

Hi,

Today, using Paolo's swazoo-pool branch, exactly the version from this
commit:
http://github.com/bonzini/smalltalk/commit/eaaee4e2b1cf35661c9f29efda3be4d0e91252dd
I got Swazoo+SCGI and lighttpd working :)

I tested it with the simple HelloWorld resource, and the results are a
lot better than using swazoo alone:

with 1000 GET requests and a concurrency of 30 requests, Swazoo handled
298 reqs/sec.

I also tested it with Iliad, and everything seems to work fine (I didn't
try multipart POST requests).

The code is available at: http://github.com/NicolasPetton/swazoo-scgi
and for now needs the exact same version of Swazoo as the one I used.


Cheers!

Nico

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

On 11/12/2009 01:32 AM, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> with 1000 GET requests and a concurrency of 30 requests, Swazoo handled
> 298 reqs/sec.

Cool!  I may actually pull all of swazoo-scgi in my branch, what do you
think?

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 23:40 +0100, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 11/12/2009 01:32 AM, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> > with 1000 GET requests and a concurrency of 30 requests, Swazoo handled
> > 298 reqs/sec.
>
> Cool!  I may actually pull all of swazoo-scgi in my branch, what do you
> think?

Sure, no problem, if you fix your branch ;)

Nico

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 00:01 +0100, Nicolas Petton a écrit :
> Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 23:40 +0100, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> > On 11/12/2009 01:32 AM, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> > > with 1000 GET requests and a concurrency of 30 requests, Swazoo handled
> > > 298 reqs/sec.
> >
> > Cool!  I may actually pull all of swazoo-scgi in my branch, what do you
> > think?
>
> Sure, no problem, if you fix your branch ;)

More seriously, I should have some time tomorrow to test your changes a
bit more. I'll try to see why Iliad adaptor doesn't work, and I'll take
a look at this multipart issue too (which is strange btw, because all
unit tests in HTTPPostTest pass).

Nico

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

On 11/13/2009 01:21 AM, Nicolas Petton wrote:
Yeah, I would have merged it in the middle of the branch rather than at
the top.

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk