On Nov 24, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> I see well your problem.
> We want to have symbol without getting with it the parser and
> compiler.
> three questions
> - can we package isLiteralSymbol: with compiler?
> - what are the senders?
> - else do we have an alternate implementation not relying on scanner?
>
> Stef
I've see with Marcus how to reverse the dependencies to have Symbol
without Scanner.
I've posted the cs on Bug Entry, but I can't charge the cs, dunno
why ...
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3283Ben