Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

System vs System-support package

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 5 messages Options
Michael Roberts-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

System vs System-support package

Michael Roberts-2
I am about to post a deprecation of SystemVersion>>version: to 1.2 but
once i have made my changes i see something odd in MC browser:

dirty packages
* System (System-StephaneDucasse.6)
* System-Support (System-Support-StephaneDucasse.317)

Stef, have you started to publish System as a whole? did you mean to?
My changes therefore hit two packages. System is still packaged in 1.2
at its sub-level of ~20 packages.

thanks,
Mike

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Stéphane Ducasse
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: System vs System-support package

Stéphane Ducasse
there is probably a problem since we worked with pavel on reorganization at the package level.

Stef

On Jul 4, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:

> I am about to post a deprecation of SystemVersion>>version: to 1.2 but
> once i have made my changes i see something odd in MC browser:
>
> dirty packages
> * System (System-StephaneDucasse.6)
> * System-Support (System-Support-StephaneDucasse.317)
>
> Stef, have you started to publish System as a whole? did you mean to?
> My changes therefore hit two packages. System is still packaged in 1.2
> at its sub-level of ~20 packages.
>
> thanks,
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Michael Roberts-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: System vs System-support package

Michael Roberts-2
I can create a bug entry, but i was wondering what the fix was? In the
image the System package does not correctly know about its
repositories. I guess anyway we have to remove it programmatically in
an update. Do you know that it doesn't contain any changes that are
not also in its children?

thanks,
Mike

On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> there is probably a problem since we worked with pavel on reorganization at the package level.
>
> Stef
>
> On Jul 4, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
>
>> I am about to post a deprecation of SystemVersion>>version: to 1.2 but
>> once i have made my changes i see something odd in MC browser:
>>
>> dirty packages
>> * System (System-StephaneDucasse.6)
>> * System-Support (System-Support-StephaneDucasse.317)
>>
>> Stef, have you started to publish System as a whole? did you mean to?
>> My changes therefore hit two packages. System is still packaged in 1.2
>> at its sub-level of ~20 packages.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Stéphane Ducasse
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: System vs System-support package

Stéphane Ducasse

On Jul 5, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:

> I can create a bug entry, but i was wondering what the fix was? In the
> image the System package does not correctly know about its
> repositories. I guess anyway we have to remove it programmatically in
> an update. Do you know that it doesn't contain any changes that are
> not also in its children?

there are none I imagine. Not sure :)

Stef

>
> thanks,
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> there is probably a problem since we worked with pavel on reorganization at the package level.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> I am about to post a deprecation of SystemVersion>>version: to 1.2 but
>>> once i have made my changes i see something odd in MC browser:
>>>
>>> dirty packages
>>> * System (System-StephaneDucasse.6)
>>> * System-Support (System-Support-StephaneDucasse.317)
>>>
>>> Stef, have you started to publish System as a whole? did you mean to?
>>> My changes therefore hit two packages. System is still packaged in 1.2
>>> at its sub-level of ~20 packages.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Marcus Denker-4
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: System vs System-support package

Marcus Denker-4

On Jul 6, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

>
> On Jul 5, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
>
>> I can create a bug entry, but i was wondering what the fix was? In the
>> image the System package does not correctly know about its
>> repositories. I guess anyway we have to remove it programmatically in
>> an update.

Yes

>> Do you know that it doesn't contain any changes that are
>> not also in its children?
>

It does not.

I will do that with the next update.

> there are none I imagine. Not sure :)
>
> Stef
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> there is probably a problem since we worked with pavel on reorganization at the package level.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> On Jul 4, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am about to post a deprecation of SystemVersion>>version: to 1.2 but
>>>> once i have made my changes i see something odd in MC browser:
>>>>
>>>> dirty packages
>>>> * System (System-StephaneDucasse.6)
>>>> * System-Support (System-Support-StephaneDucasse.317)
>>>>
>>>> Stef, have you started to publish System as a whole? did you mean to?
>>>> My changes therefore hit two packages. System is still packaged in 1.2
>>>> at its sub-level of ~20 packages.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page