TRCanvas inspector

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

TRCanvas inspector

Peter Uhnak
Why is TRCanvas rendered in inspector using RTView?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorViewIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -10>
composite roassal2
title: 'Canvas';
initializeView: [ RTView new setCanvas: self ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


shouldn't this be isolated from Roassal layer?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorCanvasIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -20>
composite morph
title: 'Canvas';
morph: [ 
self buildMorph.
self morph ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: TRCanvas inspector

Peter Uhnak
Maybe the zooming...

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
Why is TRCanvas rendered in inspector using RTView?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorViewIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -10>
composite roassal2
title: 'Canvas';
initializeView: [ RTView new setCanvas: self ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


shouldn't this be isolated from Roassal layer?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorCanvasIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -20>
composite morph
title: 'Canvas';
morph: [ 
self buildMorph.
self morph ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: TRCanvas inspector

Tudor Girba-2
Yes. It's was the reuse of the presentation. But, feel free to modify it :). Your suggestion sounds better.

Cheers,
Doru


On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
Maybe the zooming...

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
Why is TRCanvas rendered in inspector using RTView?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorViewIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -10>
composite roassal2
title: 'Canvas';
initializeView: [ RTView new setCanvas: self ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


shouldn't this be isolated from Roassal layer?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorCanvasIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -20>
composite morph
title: 'Canvas';
morph: [ 
self buildMorph.
self morph ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: TRCanvas inspector

abergel
+1



Le 1 août 2015 à 10:25, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> a écrit :

Yes. It's was the reuse of the presentation. But, feel free to modify it :). Your suggestion sounds better.

Cheers,
Doru


On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
Maybe the zooming...

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
Why is TRCanvas rendered in inspector using RTView?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorViewIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -10>
composite roassal2
title: 'Canvas';
initializeView: [ RTView new setCanvas: self ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


shouldn't this be isolated from Roassal layer?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorCanvasIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -20>
composite morph
title: 'Canvas';
morph: [ 
self buildMorph.
self morph ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: TRCanvas inspector

abergel
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Yes, I’ve tried your method, and indeed, it removes the zooming and export.
Looks like the current implementation is not that bad :-)

Cheers,
Alexandre



> On Aug 1, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Maybe the zooming...
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Why is TRCanvas rendered in inspector using RTView?
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> TRCanvas>>gtInspectorViewIn: composite
> <gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -10>
> composite roassal2
> title: 'Canvas';
> initializeView: [ RTView new setCanvas: self ]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> shouldn't this be isolated from Roassal layer?
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> TRCanvas>>gtInspectorCanvasIn: composite
> <gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -20>
> composite morph
> title: 'Canvas';
> morph: [
> self buildMorph.
> self morph ]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev