-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Future of Dolphin Date: 10 Aug 2007 12:55:54 GMT From: Andy Bower <[hidden email]> Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk.dolphin It is with great regret and more than a touch of sadness that I have to announce that Blair and I have made the decision to stop selling and developing Dolphin Smalltalk. We will continue to distribute the free version of Dolphin X6 indefinitely but, as from today, we will not be selling the Professional version. Some limited support will remain in place for existing users of X6 but there will not be a future major release of Dolphin for .net (or Mac or Linux). We have come to this point for a number of reasons, the most potent of which is the fact that it is just not commercially viable (and to be truthful it has never really been so) to continue development of the product. There are simply not enough people who are able to recognise that Smalltalk offers something much better than the tools and languages "du jour". The shift of Microsoft away from the Win32 API to the .net platform (and the associated presentation foundation) has not helped and would mean a dedicated development effort of sufficient intensity that we just can't commit to it given the potential returns. We started Object Arts almost exactly 10 years ago with a view to continuing the development of Dolphin which had been started and then abruptly terminated at our previous company, Intuitive Systems Ltd. Both of us were of a mind that this was something that needed to be done; not only because Smalltalk was quite the best development environment we had come across but because we felt that the work already completed on Dolphin was some of the best we had achieved in our careers to that point. It seemed important that Dolphin Smalltalk should be carried forward and that other developers be given the chance to "see the light". These sentiments remain with us today but the cold reality is that we have to look for other sources of income for our families and the future. As an example as to why this has become a necessary decision, I'd like to open up the sales figures for Dolphin Professional this last year. So far in 2007 we have received 29 orders and in the last 12 months, at total of 50 orders. We probably have an active user database of around 500 users but simple maths shows that this is plainly insufficient to support any business plan let alone one that needs to dedicate substantial additional effort for future development. So what of the future? Blair has taken up a job with Microsoft Research in the UK and I am occupied full-time developing stock trading systems under the Alchemetrics banner (still using Dolphin Smalltalk). The latter should mean that Dolphin will not die quickly because we have a wealth of software that relies on it to continuing operating smoothly. The nature of Smalltalk with the fact that most of the source is "open" means that existing users should be able to continue using the Dolphin products and not have to port away to other platforms (and hopefully never to C# or Java). We will try to issue the 6.1 maintenance release that we have been using internally (wrapping all outstanding bug fixes) before the end of this year. There will no doubt be a number of you who would suggest that we Open Source Dolphin. Of course, you are free harbour such opinions and to discuss the idea on the newsgroup but please do not expect us to be persuaded. It simply will not happen! Both Blair and I dislike the Open Source movement intensely and we would rather see Dolphin gradually disappear into the sands of time than instantly lose all commercial value in one fell swoop. But this is a discussion for another thread. The best, and probably only, way in which the future of Dolphin could be assured would be a sale of the assets to another company. Whilst we are not actively seeking buyers, serious negotiations can be started by writing to me at my e-mail address. At this point, I cannot sign off without commenting on the enthusiasm and talent in the Dolphin community that has sustained us all these years. There are people on this newsgroup who have been with us since the early days back in 1997. There are a number of you who have supported Dolphin far beyond the call of duty and I sincerely thank you for this. I don't want to name names for fear that I forget someone but you know who you are and I thank you again. Doubtless, many of you will be disappointed by this decision but I hope that you understand now why this has to be. Best regards, Andy Bower Dolphin Support PS: we came to this decision several weeks ago. For those of you who have recently purchased Dolphin Professional and are now unhappy with the decision, we will honour requests for a refund for any purchases made within the last 60 days. AB. -- The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in Calvin & the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. Hobbes. -- Eliot ,,,^..^,,, Smalltalk - scene not herd |
just a
small correction to the NC versions: their Community Edition was free
(Perhaps it is even now)..
But it
is bad news indeed.
Best
regards,
Janos From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Yakov Zaytsev Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:05 PM To: Eliot Miranda Cc: [hidden email]; vwnc Subject: Re: Terrible News. Dolphin is Dying. It's really hard to imagine how someone could survive on the current market with such "unusual" thing like Smalltalk without making Right Things like moving to Open Source, providing NC versions like VisualWorks maker do an so on.. not to mention misc technical advantages which for example exist in various successful Lisp implementation. I'm talking about DLLs on every platform etc etc.. Just my 50 cents.. On 8/10/07, Eliot
Miranda <[hidden email]>
wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Eliot Miranda-2
If you have a business model that supports the
ongoing development for a product like Cincom Smalltalk, I'd love to hear
it. I've done a fair bit of examination of the possibilities, and while I
don't share the visceral dislike of OSS that the Dolphin guys have, I have my
own issues with the model.
----- Original Message -----
|
Personally, I think it's quaint to dislike or like Open Source. It's
just an alternative among alternatives... Personally, I don't think that going all Open Source (hell, you're already 90% sorta Open Source anyway, for all practical purposes ;-)) wouldn't make a big difference for Cincom. You'd get some non-paying customers, you'd get some more exposure. Might just balance. Or not. :) Anyway, if the Dolphin guys rather see their stuff wither away than release source code, fine. It's their stuff... But for Dolphin, it *could* have enabled them to do the .net stuff as a community effort... On 8/11/07, James Robertson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > If you have a business model that supports the ongoing development for a > product like Cincom Smalltalk, I'd love to hear it. I've done a fair bit of > examination of the possibilities, and while I don't share the visceral > dislike of OSS that the Dolphin guys have, I have my own issues with the > model. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Yakov Zaytsev > To: Eliot Miranda > Cc: [hidden email] ; vwnc > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 4:04 PM > Subject: Re: Terrible News. Dolphin is Dying. > > Pity that guys have so "uncommon" view of Open Source movement.. > > It's really hard to imagine how someone could survive on the current market > with such "unusual" thing like Smalltalk without making Right Things like > moving to Open Source, providing NC versions like VisualWorks maker do an so > on.. not to mention misc technical advantages which for example exist in > various successful Lisp implementation. I'm talking about DLLs on every > platform etc etc.. > > Just my 50 cents.. > > > On 8/10/07, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Future of Dolphin > > Date: 10 Aug 2007 12:55:54 GMT > > From: Andy Bower < [hidden email]> > > Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk.dolphin > > > > It is with great regret and more than a touch of sadness that I have to > > announce that Blair and I have made the decision to stop selling and > > developing Dolphin Smalltalk. We will continue to distribute the free > > version of Dolphin X6 indefinitely but, as from today, we will not be > > selling the Professional version. Some limited support will remain in > > place for existing users of X6 but there will not be a future major > > release of Dolphin for .net (or Mac or Linux). > > > > We have come to this point for a number of reasons, the most potent of > > which is the fact that it is just not commercially viable (and to be > > truthful it has never really been so) to continue development of the > > product. There are simply not enough people who are able to recognise > > that Smalltalk offers something much better than the tools and > > languages "du jour". The shift of Microsoft away from the Win32 API to > > the .net platform (and the associated presentation foundation) has not > > helped and would mean a dedicated development effort of sufficient > > intensity that we just can't commit to it given the potential returns. > > > > We started Object Arts almost exactly 10 years ago with a view to > > continuing the development of Dolphin which had been started and then > > abruptly terminated at our previous company, Intuitive Systems Ltd. > > Both of us were of a mind that this was something that needed to be > > done; not only because Smalltalk was quite the best development > > environment we had come across but because we felt that the work > > already completed on Dolphin was some of the best we had achieved in > > our careers to that point. It seemed important that Dolphin Smalltalk > > should be carried forward and that other developers be given the chance > > to "see the light". These sentiments remain with us today but the cold > > reality is that we have to look for other sources of income for our > > families and the future. > > > > As an example as to why this has become a necessary decision, I'd like > > to open up the sales figures for Dolphin Professional this last year. > > So far in 2007 we have received 29 orders and in the last 12 months, at > > total of 50 orders. We probably have an active user database of around > > 500 users but simple maths shows that this is plainly insufficient to > > support any business plan let alone one that needs to dedicate > > substantial additional effort for future development. > > > > So what of the future? Blair has taken up a job with Microsoft > > Research in the UK and I am occupied full-time developing stock trading > > systems under the Alchemetrics banner (still using Dolphin Smalltalk). > > The latter should mean that Dolphin will not die quickly because we > > have a wealth of software that relies on it to continuing operating > > smoothly. The nature of Smalltalk with the fact that most of the source > > is "open" means that existing users should be able to continue using > > the Dolphin products and not have to port away to other platforms (and > > hopefully never to C# or Java). We will try to issue the 6.1 > > maintenance release that we have been using internally (wrapping all > > outstanding bug fixes) before the end of this year. > > > > There will no doubt be a number of you who would suggest that we Open > > Source Dolphin. Of course, you are free harbour such opinions and to > > discuss the idea on the newsgroup but please do not expect us to be > > persuaded. It simply will not happen! Both Blair and I dislike the > > Open Source movement intensely and we would rather see Dolphin > > gradually disappear into the sands of time than instantly lose all > > commercial value in one fell swoop. But this is a discussion for > > another thread. The best, and probably only, way in which the future > > of Dolphin could be assured would be a sale of the assets to another > > company. Whilst we are not actively seeking buyers, serious > > negotiations can be started by writing to me at my e-mail address. > > > > At this point, I cannot sign off without commenting on the enthusiasm > > and talent in the Dolphin community that has sustained us all these > > years. There are people on this newsgroup who have been with us since > > the early days back in 1997. There are a number of you who have > > supported Dolphin far beyond the call of duty and I sincerely thank you > > for this. I don't want to name names for fear that I forget someone > > but you know who you are and I thank you again. Doubtless, many of you > > will be disappointed by this decision but I hope that you understand > > now why this has to be. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andy Bower > > Dolphin Support > > > > PS: we came to this decision several weeks ago. For those of you who > > have recently purchased Dolphin Professional and are now unhappy with > > the decision, we will honour requests for a refund for any purchases > > made within the last 60 days. AB. > > > > -- > > The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in Calvin & > > the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. Hobbes. > > -- > > Eliot ,,,^..^,,, Smalltalk - scene not herd > > > > > > -- "Human beings make life so interesting. Do you know, that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom. " - Death, in "The Hogfather" |
In reply to this post by Janos
AFAIK
with the exception of the .exe deployment package it was the same as the
professional.
From: Yakov Zaytsev [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:29 PM To: Kazsoki, Janos Cc: Eliot Miranda; [hidden email]; vwnc Subject: Re: Terrible News. Dolphin is Dying. On 8/11/07, Kazsoki,
Janos <[hidden email]>
wrote:
Was it full featured edition?
|
From the announcement:
- "We will continue to distribute the free version of Dolphin X6 indefinitely ..." Details of the differences between the "Dolphin Community Edition" and "Dolphin Professional" are given on the Object Arts website- http://www.object-arts.com/content/navigation/products/dpro.html And of course there's been discussion where you might expect it http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.smalltalk.dolphin/browse_thread/thread/ee6d4f1efe3f3852/4e3b01fdd765d32b#4e3b01fdd765d32b --- "Kazsoki, Janos" <[hidden email]> wrote: > AFAIK with the exception of the .exe deployment package it was the > same as the professional. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Yakov Zaytsev [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:29 PM > To: Kazsoki, Janos > Cc: Eliot Miranda; [hidden email]; vwnc > Subject: Re: Terrible News. Dolphin is Dying. > > > > > On 8/11/07, Kazsoki, Janos <[hidden email]> wrote: > > just a small correction to the NC versions: their Community Edition > was free (Perhaps it is even now).. > > > Was it full featured edition? > > > > But it is bad news indeed. > > Best regards, > Janos > > ________________________________ > > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] > On Behalf Of Yakov Zaytsev > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:05 PM > To: Eliot Miranda > Cc: [hidden email]; vwnc > Subject: Re: Terrible News. Dolphin is Dying. > > > > Pity that guys have so "uncommon" view of Open Source movement.. > > It's really hard to imagine how someone could survive on the current > market with such "unusual" thing like Smalltalk without making Right > Things like moving to Open Source, providing NC versions like > VisualWorks maker do an so on.. not to mention misc technical > advantages which for example exist in various successful Lisp > implementation. I'm talking about DLLs on every platform etc etc.. > > Just my 50 cents.. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |