Tests
Locked
 
|
Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following
results: 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? Cheers, Adrian [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
It's possible that the baseline mechanism isn't accurate. I'll check
that. Someone could also verify the baselines. That would help. Cheers, Mike On Sunday, July 5, 2009, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote: > Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following > results: > 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors > > Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: > 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors > > > > I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults > > ___________________ > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
On 05.07.2009, at 12:36, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following > results: > 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors > > Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: > 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors > > > > I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? > (written by Cyrille). Marcus -- Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
It's probably that.
I just try to run the tests from FloatArray ( that was not tested at all before), it represent 251 tests. With all collections tested it seems possible that there is like 2000 new tests.
2009/7/6 Marcus Denker <[hidden email]>
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following > results: > 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors > > Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: > 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors > > > I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-) -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Adrian Lienhard
traits at work :)
Stef On Jul 5, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following > results: > 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors > > Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: > 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors > > > > I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults > > ___________________ > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Damien Cassou
Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling
the truth.,... Mike On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<[hidden email]> wrote: >> Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following >> results: >> 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors >> >> Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: >> 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors >> >> >> I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? > > More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-) > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
Yes mike so if you can check that it would just great.
On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote: > Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling > the truth.,... > Mike > On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following >>> results: >>> 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors >>> >>> Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: >>> 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors >>> >>> >>> I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? >> >> More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-) _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
yes i will do. just a bit busy ;-) but it's great to see a bunch of
new tests in the image. I will post my scripts onto the wiki and perhaps someone can review for inclusion in the image - needs a bit of work. i would like a single click that writes out the test run in google wiki format then anyone can upload baseline results. we could then host this on a server somewhere etc.... cheers mike On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse<[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes mike so if you can check that it would just great. > > On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote: > >> Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling >> the truth.,... >> Mike >> On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>> Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following >>>> results: >>>> 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors >>>> >>>> Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: >>>> 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors >>>> >>>> >>>> I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? >>> >>> More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |