Thanks All.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Thanks All.

Ian Ian
After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given the current options.

Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.

Too bad ObjectDB does as well.

Thanks all. :)

On Dec 25, 2017 12:00 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Send Pharo-users mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.pharo.org/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pharo-users digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Object Persistence (Hilaire)
   2. Re: Object Persistence (Joachim Tuchel)
   3. Re: Object Persistence (Torsten Bergmann)
   4. Re: Object Persistence (Stephane Ducasse)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hilaire <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:08:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
Fuel (present in the image) is nice, but not compatible from one image version to another one.

Hilaire


Le 25/12/2017 à 10:43, Ian Ian a écrit :
Hi All,

Thoughts of a purely OO nature?

:)

--
Dr. Geo
http://drgeo.eu






---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joachim Tuchel <[hidden email]>
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <[hidden email]>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:54:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
Wasn’t there an attempt to port Magma over from Squeak? That would sound like a nice alternative. Or Gemstone, of course.

> Am 25.12.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Ian Ian <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
>
> :)





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome <[hidden email]>
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:13:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
Hi,

with Voyage you can already use easy persistence in an OO way - with tiny (P)UnQlite up to Mongo.

Check https://github.com/pharo-nosql

Or you use Gemstone.

For a full Magma version on Pharo:
I doubt that will happen as Chris Muller was and still is more oriented towards Squeak as
development platform. He is the author of Magma and beside the port it would cost him
(or anyone who would do such a port) more effort to maintain another Pharo specific version.

But maybe a Pharo client for a Squeak based Magma server is possible - with a Voyage wrapper.

Bye
T.

> Gesendet: Montag, 25. Dezember 2017 um 12:54 Uhr
> Von: "Joachim Tuchel" <[hidden email]>
> An: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <[hidden email]>
> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
>
> Wasn’t there an attempt to port Magma over from Squeak? That would sound like a nice alternative. Or Gemstone, of course.
>
> > Am 25.12.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Ian Ian <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
> >
> > :)
>
>
>




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]>
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <[hidden email]>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:01:15 +0100
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
the author of omnibase told me that he always wanted to port it to
Pharo. But may be someone should do it.
There is also VOSS that is open source even if GPL that could be
ported to pharo but this is an effort too.

Stef

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Ian Ian <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
>
> :)



_______________________________________________
Pharo-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.pharo.org/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Thanks All.

Stephan Eggermont-3
Op 26-12-2017 om 14:03 schreef Ian Ian:
> After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given
> the current options.
>
> Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.

I have always found the Gemstone people very approachable, and open to
trying out ideas.

Stephan


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Thanks All.

Stephan Eggermont-3
In reply to this post by Ian Ian
Op 26-12-2017 om 14:03 schreef Ian Ian:
> After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given
> the current options.
>
> Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.

I have always found the Gemstone people very approachable, and open to
trying out ideas.

Stephan


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Thanks All.

Stephan Eggermont-3
In reply to this post by Ian Ian
Op 26-12-2017 om 14:03 schreef Ian Ian:
> After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given
> the current options.
>
> Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.

I have always found the Gemstone people very approachable, and open to
trying out ideas.

Stephan