Hi. I have just tested the Windows VM availables and tested the 1 tinyBenchmarks and running all tests of PharoDev RC3.
I tested with this Windows VMs: 1) The one that it is in pharo website (PharoVM-Win32-3.11.8): 2) The other one from pharo website (exupery-vm-0.15-win32): 3) THe new one that Andreas released today (SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin) 1) vm\SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin\ has freetype 1 tinyBenchmarks '404104183 bytecodes/sec; 11914092 sends/sec' '363120567 bytecodes/sec; 10946039 sends/sec' '390839694 bytecodes/sec; 12597221 sends/sec' '346179851 bytecodes/sec; 9996295 sends/sec' 1 gofer test fails 2) exupery-vm-0.15-win32 doesnt have freetype. Unacceptable for Pharo. 1 tinyBenchmarks '365714285 bytecodes/sec; 9935342 sends/sec' '365975696 bytecodes/sec; 10435290 sends/sec' '349011588 bytecodes/sec; 16777208 sends/sec' '339973439 bytecodes/sec; 11292844 sends/sec' Two RB test with errors 3) SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin has freetype 1 tinyBenchmarks '353835521 bytecodes/sec; 11294326 sends/sec' '415922014 bytecodes/sec; 12319712 sends/sec' '369675090 bytecodes/sec; 11149338 sends/sec' '373177842 bytecodes/sec; 9858402 sends/sec' all tests geen We suggestion is to remove the Exupery Vm from the pharo website. The new version 4.1 doesn't seem to be improvements in speed and from what I read about Andreas comment, it only fixes problems for SqueakMap, which was removed in Pharo, and a change in the close event of the windows. I would only let for download the PharoVM-Win32-3.11.8 Cheers Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Ehm, that was a change to allow old image segments to load correctly,
squeakmap just happened to be the broken usecase. Cheers, Henry Den 29. mars 2010 kl. 00.44 skrev Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email] >: > The new version 4.1 doesn't seem to be improvements in speed and > from what I read about Andreas comment, it only fixes problems for > SqueakMap, which was removed in Pharo, and a change in the close > event of the windows. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Sorry, correct me if I'm wrong, but Pharo don't have its own Win VM right?
Then if Pharo relies on the Squeak Windows VM I think that a good policy is use the latest. Just my opinion. Cheers. Germán. 2010/3/28 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>: > Hi. I have just tested the Windows VM availables and tested the 1 > tinyBenchmarks and running all tests of PharoDev RC3. > > I tested with this Windows VMs: > > 1) The one that it is in pharo website (PharoVM-Win32-3.11.8): > 2) The other one from pharo website (exupery-vm-0.15-win32): > 3) THe new one that Andreas released today (SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin) > > > 1) vm\SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin\ > > has freetype > > 1 tinyBenchmarks > '404104183 bytecodes/sec; 11914092 sends/sec' > '363120567 bytecodes/sec; 10946039 sends/sec' > '390839694 bytecodes/sec; 12597221 sends/sec' > '346179851 bytecodes/sec; 9996295 sends/sec' > > 1 gofer test fails > > > 2) exupery-vm-0.15-win32 > > doesnt have freetype. Unacceptable for Pharo. > > 1 tinyBenchmarks > '365714285 bytecodes/sec; 9935342 sends/sec' > '365975696 bytecodes/sec; 10435290 sends/sec' > '349011588 bytecodes/sec; 16777208 sends/sec' > '339973439 bytecodes/sec; 11292844 sends/sec' > > Two RB test with errors > > > 3) SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin > > has freetype > > 1 tinyBenchmarks > '353835521 bytecodes/sec; 11294326 sends/sec' > '415922014 bytecodes/sec; 12319712 sends/sec' > '369675090 bytecodes/sec; 11149338 sends/sec' > '373177842 bytecodes/sec; 9858402 sends/sec' > > all tests geen > > > We suggestion is to remove the Exupery Vm from the pharo website. > The new version 4.1 doesn't seem to be improvements in speed and from what I > read about Andreas comment, it only fixes problems for SqueakMap, which was > removed in Pharo, and a change in the close event of the windows. > I would only let for download the PharoVM-Win32-3.11.8 > > > Cheers > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Germán Arduino <[hidden email]> wrote: Sorry, correct me if I'm wrong, but Pharo don't have its own Win VM right? No, I don't think so. I don't know who did it, but at the end it is a squeak VM. I mean, the sources come from svn or vmmaker or both, but there is no fork (maybe i am wrong). Ok, we changed the splash picture and the name. Does someone know? Just my opinion. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Mar 30, 2010, at 9:53 35AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
No forking, just custom .rc files to "rebrand" it. Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |