Traits score: Squeak: 1, Pharo5: 0

>
>     Le 14/04/2017 à 15:24, Denis Kudriashov a écrit :
>     >
>     > Could you create example set of packages to reproduce problem? (to be
>     > not dependant on your private code)
>     >
>
>
> How to reproduce:
>

> How to reproduce:
>
> "Create a Trait"
> Trait named:#TRoot
> uses:{} package:'MyPackage'.
>
> "Add some methods"
> (Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot') compile:'trootA'.
> (Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot') compile:'trootB'.
> (Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot') compile:'trootC'.
>
> "Create another Trait using this Trait"
> Trait named:#TRootUser
> uses:{(Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot')} package:'MyPackage'.
>
> "Add more methods.
> Note, methods still added on TRoot"
> (Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot') compile:'troot1'.
> (Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot') compile:'troot2'.
> (Smalltalk classOrTraitNamed:'TRoot') compile:'troot3'.
>
> "Trait TRootUser should not have any local methods"
> (RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed:'MyPackage') methods inspect.
>
>
> Exprected outcome:
> All methods are only defined on Trait TRoot.
> Actual  outcome:
> Methods from TRoot added before creating the Trait that uses TRoot, are
> *added* to the using trait, but only in the RPackage, the trait, *using*
> TRoot still *knows* that it does not hold any
> local methods:
>
> TRootUser localMethods.
> ->  "#()"
> TRoot localMethods
> -> "{TRoot>>#troot1. TRoot>>#troot3. TRoot>>#trootC. TRoot>>#trootB.
> TRoot>>#trootA. TRoot>>#troot2}"
>
> Now, if we store a snapshot of this package, the RGMethodDefinitions,
> wrongly assigned to trait TRootUser, will be flattened into that trait.
>
>