Tree view in IE

I am finding that the tree view does not display very well in ie, is it
just me?

Keith


_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

Which Tree View?

        WATree?

        PRTreeWidget?

        SUTreeReport?

On Feb 6, 2008, at 12:04 , Keith Hodges wrote:

--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch


_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

Lukas Renggli wrote:
> Which Tree View?
>  
> PRTreeWidget?
>
>
The Navigation widget...

Keith


_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

How does your stylesheet look like?

This is a normal nested list.

On Feb 6, 2008, at 12:57 , Keith Hodges wrote:

--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch


_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

Lukas Renggli wrote:
> How does your stylesheet look like?
>
> This is a normal nested list.
>
>  
The original stylesheet, though I am still stuck at versions prior to
the environment changes.

I have the tree positioned on the right hand side. If opened to 3 levels
deep, the items at that level disappear.

btw how is the blueprint css working out?

Keith




_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

That's odd. I've never seen this. If the items are in the XHTML source  
then this must be a style problem.

> btw how is the blueprint css working out?

It looks pretty cool. I guess that is a much better look as a default,  
because people can build on top of it. Of course it is still possible  
to do something completely different.

If I just had time to finish it :-S

Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch


_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>  > btw how is the blueprint css working out?
>
>  It looks pretty cool. I guess that is a much better look as a default,
>  because people can build on top of it. Of course it is still possible
>  to do something completely different.
>
>  If I just had time to finish it :-S

Are the blueprint-related changes limited to the libraries and the
environment defaults ?


--
Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

> Are the blueprint-related changes limited to the libraries and the
> environment defaults ?

There are no blueprint-related changes, it is just that the default  
environment looks slightly different to accomodate blueprint css. If  
you have your own environment and your own css that should not affect  
you. Yesterday I updated seaside.st to the very latest version of Pier  
(that has numerous of fixes and improvements) and that worked quite  
well.

Cheers,
Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch


_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki