TreeView example
Locked
 
|
Can't seem to get this to work...
Trying to have a simple workspace similar to SequenceView example3 ================ root := Object. hierarchyHolder := IndentedTreeSelectionInList listObjectHierarchy: root childBlock: [:thing | thing subclasses] childNameBlock: [:thing | thing name ]. view := TreeView openOn: hierarchyHolder. ================- Cheers, Mike Klein _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
|
Well I didn't spot your out of context email adress "javasucksman" and actually can't believe such an adress made it through my firewall. I offended you right by suggesting you're probably mixed up right ? I am really sorry but from a first sight a TreeView should be openend on a kind of tree (like MultiSelectionInTree) with a Treemodel not on Object. TreeView certainly is a kind of SequenceView but has not necessarily much to do with the example 3 you mentioned where the SéquenceView is opened on a collection and not on Object.
I can imagine that any reply upsets and mixes you up only further right ?
@+Maarten,
-----Original Message----- On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:34 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Not so far apart.. it is a direct subclass.
I'm not mixed up... if you don't want to think about the problem,
don't post. Did you even look at example3?
_______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
|
|
Double technical, 5 minute timeout to both for quarreling! :)
On 1/19/13 11:59 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Well I didn't spot your out of context email adress "javasucksman" and > actually can't believe such an adress made it through my firewall. > > > I offended you right by suggesting you're probably mixed up right ? I > am really sorry but from a first sight aTreeView should be openend on a > kind of tree (like MultiSelectionInTree) with a Treemodel not on Object. > > TreeView certainly is a kind of SequenceView but has > not necessarily much to do with the example 3 you mentioned where the > SéquenceView is opened on a collection and not on Object. > > I can imagine that any reply upsets and mixes you up only further right ? > > @+Maarten, > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Michael Klein" <[hidden email]> > Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 02:14 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [vwnc] TreeView example > > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:34 PM, <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > Well a TreeView is not the same thing as a SequenceView right. > > Not so far apart.. it is a direct subclass. > > Seems to me that you're mixing things up .. > > I'm not mixed up... if you don't want to think about the problem, > don't post. Did you even look at example3? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > Sent: Saturday, 19 January, 2013 22:34 > To: "Mike Klein" <[hidden email]> > Subject: RE: [vwnc] TreeView example > > Well a TreeView is not the same thing as a SequenceView right. > > Seems to me that you're mixing things up .. > > Regards, > > @+Maarten, > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Mike Klein" <[hidden email]> > Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 22:37 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [vwnc] TreeView example > > Can't seem to get this to work... > Trying to have a simple workspace similar to > SequenceView example3 > > ================ > root := Object. > > hierarchyHolder := IndentedTreeSelectionInList > listObjectHierarchy: root > childBlock: [:thing | thing subclasses] > childNameBlock: [:thing | thing name ]. > > view := TreeView openOn: hierarchyHolder. > ================- > > Cheers, > Mike Klein > _______________________________________________ > vwnc mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc > vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
|
|
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Andres Valloud <[hidden email]> wrote:
Double technical, 5 minute timeout to both for quarreling! :) Five minutes?!?!?!? I thought ten was a good number.
I have my ways
Right.
I was using the class hierarchy as a convenient and familiar tree, with Object being the root.
Yes.. I wanted an example in the spirit of example3.... not to make (1 to: 500 by: 10) look like a tree.
Wrong.. well consider replies are good... your not likely to mix me up in either case.
None the less, sorry I was snippy, but I didn't do it on the list. Alas, I wish I could just buy you a beer. Enough fun, back to work.... The following does what I want...
BUT now make it work in a workspace without the Painter (preferably without the UIBuilder) in the spirit of [ SequenceView class >># example3 ] =======
From VisualWorks® Personal Use Edition, 7.8 of March 30, 2011 on January 20, 2013 at 4:56:44 PM Class Smalltalk.TreeSample Superclass: UI.ApplicationModel
Type: none Instance variables: tree Attributes: #(#(#package '(none)'))
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TreeSample class methods for 'interface specs' windowSpec "Tools.UIPainter new openOnClass: self andSelector: #windowSpec"
<resource: #canvas> ^#(#{UI.FullSpec} #window:
#(#{UI.WindowSpec} #label: 'Unlabeled Canvas' #bounds: #(#{Graphics.Rectangle} 540 173 958 489 ) )
#component: #(#{UI.SpecCollection} #collection: #(
#(#{UI.TreeViewSpec} #layout: #(#{Graphics.LayoutFrame} 38 0 28 0 -27 1 -86 1 )
#name: #TreeView1 #model: #tree #useModifierKeys: true
#selectionType: #highlight ) #(#{UI.ActionButtonSpec} #layout: #(#{Graphics.LayoutFrame} 69 0 -63 1 156 0 -19 1 )
#name: #ActionButton1 #model: #inspect #label: 'Inspect'
#defaultable: true ) ) ) ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TreeSample methods for 'aspects'
tree | treeModel | tree notNil ifTrue: [^tree].
tree := SelectionInTree new. treeModel := TreeModel on: Object
displayRoot: true childrenWith: [:each | each subclasses asSortedCollection: [ :a :b | a name <= b name] ].
tree treeHolder value: treeModel. ^tree
=======
_______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
|
|
On 1/20/13 2:04 PM, Michael Klein wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Andres Valloud <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > Double technical, 5 minute timeout to both for quarreling! :) > > > Five minutes?!?!?!? > I thought ten was a good number. ... well you're right... TEN MINUTES!!! :D Andres. _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
«
Return to VisualWorks
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |