Smalltalk › Amber Smalltalk

UI development in Amber

Classic

List

Threaded

26 messages Options

Amber Milan Eskridge

Re: UI development in Amber

I ported the parts of the code, so no. Actually most Obj-J methods

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:54 PM, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Did it take time because of Objective-J? This adds to the complexity
having three languages....

The code is now Amber so there are only 2 languages involved. Actually most Obj-J methods became one-liners (two-liners if you count the method signature).

Remove Ads

Amber Milan Eskridge

Re: UI development in Amber

In reply to this post by Nicolas Petton

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> wrote:

Awesome!! Can we get the code? :)

I know that this apporach was taken by a German student and that the resulting code will most definetelly be OS.

Amber Milan Eskridge

Re: UI development in Amber

In reply to this post by Amber Milan Eskridge

Oh my.

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Amber Milan Eskridge <[hidden email]> wrote:

I ported the parts of the code, so no. Actually most Obj-J methods

This first part was a draft in answer to hannes; it that has gotten there by accident and was not intended as a rude answer to your question, Nico.

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Amber Milan Eskridge <[hidden email]> wrote:

I ported the parts of the code, so no. Actually most Obj-J methods

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:54 PM, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Did it take time because of Objective-J? This adds to the complexity
having three languages....

The code is now Amber so there are only 2 languages involved. Actually most Obj-J methods became one-liners (two-liners if you count the method signature).

Nicolas Petton

Re: UI development in Amber

On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 19:44 +0100, Amber Milan Eskridge wrote:
> Oh my.

No offense taken :)

Nico

> This first part was a draft in answer to hannes; it that has gotten
> there by accident and was not intended as a rude answer to your
> question, Nico.
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Amber Milan Eskridge
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I ported the parts of the code, so no. Actually most Obj-J
> methods
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:54 PM, H. Hirzel
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Did it take time because of Objective-J? This adds to
> the complexity
> having three languages....
>
>
> The code is now Amber so there are only 2 languages involved.
> Actually most Obj-J methods became one-liners (two-liners if
> you count the method signature).
>

Guido Stepken

Re: UI development in Amber

In reply to this post by Amber Milan Eskridge

Read about Pastrykit and building "near native IOS Apps" with JavaScript:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1012559

For me Apples next step is quite clear!

"This is the end ..." (Doors) :-(

regards, Guido Stepken

Am 29.01.2012 19:40 schrieb "Amber Milan Eskridge" <[hidden email]>:

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> wrote:

Awesome!! Can we get the code? :)

I know that this apporach was taken by a German student and that the resulting code will most definetelly be OS.

Amber Milan Eskridge

Re: UI development in Amber

No, I don't think so.

1. The repository is still online and accessable.

2. Cappuccino still exits, even though it is owned by a mayor competitor.

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Guido Stepken <[hidden email]> wrote:

Read about Pastrykit and building "near native IOS Apps" with JavaScript:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1012559

For me Apples next step is quite clear!

"This is the end ..." (Doors) :-(

regards, Guido Stepken

Am 29.01.2012 19:40 schrieb "Amber Milan Eskridge" <[hidden email]>:

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> wrote:

Awesome!! Can we get the code? :)

I know that this apporach was taken by a German student and that the resulting code will most definetelly be OS.