UML like diagrams from Moose panel
Locked
UML like diagrams from Moose panel
 
|
Hi,
For preparing my teaching course I would have love to have simple class hierarchy visualisations or even better, real UML representations. Unfortunately, the UML like diagram from the Moose panel is not zoomable. It is by default in light grey saying that it is harder to read. It contains all the attributes and all the methods so it is difficult to put it in a single readable picture. Please make the experiment with the Famix-Core classes. I was not able to do easily a class hierarchy with the name of the classes. After more than one hour, I gave up. So it could be good, if we can have: - a class hierarchy with only the names of the classes in boxes or not - a class hierarchy with only attributes - a class hierarchy with only methods - the existing "UML" representation - a real metamodel representation. Not as a system complexity representation, but as a real UML representation meaning with inheritance AND associations (those can be deduce from pragmas and now with the new MooseQuery API, we get all the methods to do it). It should be possible to easily specify which classes we want to represent. It seems to me the minimum vital to do real analyses. In my course, I wanted to show I extended FAMIX for SQL purpose. It was so complex (because I don’t want not all FAMIX entity, but just the one from which the SQL classes inherit and without the methods) that once again I gave up. I don’t have enough time to better look for. But anyway, I find it sad that it is so hard even for people knowing (a bit) Moose of not being able to do that. Cheers, Anne _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
Since I've made this video yesterday for my benefactors, I might as well share it here now this is still far from done, however I do use FAMIX to represent the model (I have of course extended it, because FAMIX has no notion of multiplicities etc.), but in principle it should be able to visualize some subset of the FAMIX model. If you want to look at it yourself, you can download ready-to-use image (based on Moose 6) here https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/DynaCASE/lastSuccessfulBuild/PHARO=50,VERSION=development,VM=vm/artifact/DynaCASE.zip So maybe we can come up with something that you could use? Of course many of the requirements you have can be achieved directly in Roassal, for example try running this ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | b | b := RTUMLClassBuilder new. b instanceVariables: #instVarNames. "show attributes" "b instanceVariables: #()." "hide attributes" b methodselector: #selector. "b methodsNames: #methods." "show methods" b methodsNames: #(). "hide methods" b attributeselector: #yourself. "all black, you can even have varying colors --- look at RTUMLExample>>examplecolored" b attributeShape color: Color black. b methodShape color: Color black. b classNameShape color: Color black. b lineShape color: Color black. b boxShape borderColor: Color black. b addObjects: (TREvent withAllSubclasses ). b layout tree. b build. ^b view ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Peter On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
In reply to this post by Anne Etien
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, There is a bug in the rendering of actions in the main window. It is by default in light grey saying that it is harder to read. It contains all the attributes and all the methods so it is difficult to put it in a single readable picture. Please make the experiment with the Famix-Core classes. The associations are represented as first class in Fame, but the reason we do not show them is that we do not have a layout that supports such associations. It should be possible to easily specify which classes we want to represent. It seems to me the minimum vital to do real analyses. In my course, I wanted to show I extended FAMIX for SQL purpose. It was so complex (because I don’t want not all FAMIX entity, but just the one from which the SQL classes inherit and without the methods) that once again I gave up. You can do it programatically. Take a look at MooseFameView>>viewFamixCore to see how to show a selection of the classes from the default meta-model. I think that for what you want, you should exhibit this I don’t have enough time to better look for. But anyway, I find it sad that it is so hard even for people knowing (a bit) Moose of not being able to do that. I am sad that you are sad. Sadness can be conducive for meditation, but it typically is not particularly promising for generating action :). So, let's snap out of our sadness and focus on what should be done next. Cheers, Doru Cheers, _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Thanks, Peter. Do you also have an algorithm laying out your UML diagrams? @Anne: the script of Peter should pretty much address your concerns. Is there anything else missing? Cheers, Doru On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Yes, but I cannot figure out what it is. I have simply refactored GLMRoassal2Presentation>>defaultActions I believe the behavior should be the same. Can you have a look at it? Cheers, Alexandre _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
The bug is in Glamour as it seems. For example: GLMWrapper new with: [ :w | w show: [ :a | a roassal2 title: 'With title it works'; initializeView: [ RTMondrian new ]; painting: [ :view | view nodes: (1 to: 10) ] ] ]; openOn: 42 If the bolded line is there, you get the actions, if not, they are not. Doru On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
Do you also have an algorithm laying out your UML diagrams? Not yet. Next month I should have something custom-tailored for class diagrams... Peter On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
That would be a great addition. Doru On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Indeed, that is one bug. Another bug is:
Inspecting the following gives me _working_ actions (e.g., I can do zoom in / out): RTMondrian new nodes: (1 to: 10); yourself When I execute: GLMWrapper new with: [ :w | w show: [ :a | a roassal2 title: 'With title it works'; initializeView: [ RTMondrian new ]; painting: [ :view | view nodes: (1 to: 10) ] ] ]; openOn: 42 The actions do not work :-( I cannot see why. Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Hi Peter,
I finally tried your script and it works. Super!! Thanks. Cheers, Anne Le 27 oct. 2015 à 11:54, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> a écrit :
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: UML like diagrams from Moose panel
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Le 28 oct. 2015 à 12:58, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> a écrit :
I did what I wanted with Peter's script.
Cheers, Anne
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |