VerveineJ problem

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
28 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Nicolas Anquetil

basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----

> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Cool :). What was the problem?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> > OK
> >
> > I think I got it ...
> > It is in the tests and it is green
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> >
> > Hey,
> > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> >
> > public enum TestEnum {
> >
> >     A{
> >         @Override
> >         protected void foo() {
> >             super.foo();
> >         }},
> >     B,
> >     C;
> >
> >     protected void foo(){
> >
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > it throws the following Exception:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> > at
> > fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> > at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > at
> > fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> > at
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> > at
> > fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> > at
> > fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > preserving the folder structure:
> >
> > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > done
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > >>>> relying
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > >>>> file
> > >>>> from the root folder.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > >>>
> > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > >>> are
> > >>> in the path?
> > >>
> > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > >> or if
> > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > >> the
> > >> problem stems from this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "When people care, great things can happen."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Matthias Junker-2
Hey,
i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast. 

Cheers
Matt

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Cool :). What was the problem?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> > OK
> >
> > I think I got it ...
> > It is in the tests and it is green
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> >
> > Hey,
> > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> >
> > public enum TestEnum {
> >
> >     A{
> >         @Override
> >         protected void foo() {
> >             super.foo();
> >         }},
> >     B,
> >     C;
> >
> >     protected void foo(){
> >
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > it throws the following Exception:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > preserving the folder structure:
> >
> > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > done
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > >>>> relying
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > >>>> file
> > >>>> from the root folder.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > >>>
> > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > >>> are
> > >>> in the path?
> > >>
> > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > >> or if
> > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > >> the
> > >> problem stems from this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "When people care, great things can happen."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Matthias Junker-2
However i just realized my second problem still exists. It still only parses two of the four subprojects now and stops then without exception. i tried what doru suggested but that didn't help, so the .project files were not the problem. i will try to debug a bit in order to find out what the problem is.

Cheers
Matt

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Matthias Junker <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hey,
i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast. 

Cheers
Matt


On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Cool :). What was the problem?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> > OK
> >
> > I think I got it ...
> > It is in the tests and it is green
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> >
> > Hey,
> > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> >
> > public enum TestEnum {
> >
> >     A{
> >         @Override
> >         protected void foo() {
> >             super.foo();
> >         }},
> >     B,
> >     C;
> >
> >     protected void foo(){
> >
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > it throws the following Exception:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > preserving the folder structure:
> >
> > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > done
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > >>>> relying
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > >>>> file
> > >>>> from the root folder.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > >>>
> > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > >>> are
> > >>> in the path?
> > >>
> > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > >> or if
> > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > >> the
> > >> problem stems from this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "When people care, great things can happen."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Tudor Girba
Thanks, Matt.

Cheers,
Doru

On 1 May 2011, at 22:51, Matthias Junker wrote:

> However i just realized my second problem still exists. It still only parses two of the four subprojects now and stops then without exception. i tried what doru suggested but that didn't help, so the .project files were not the problem. i will try to debug a bit in order to find out what the problem is.
>
> Cheers
> Matt
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Matthias Junker <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hey,
> i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast.
>
> Cheers
> Matt
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)
>
> nicolas
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> > De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > Cool :). What was the problem?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > > OK
> > >
> > > I think I got it ...
> > > It is in the tests and it is green
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >
> > > Hey,
> > > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> > >
> > > public enum TestEnum {
> > >
> > >     A{
> > >         @Override
> > >         protected void foo() {
> > >             super.foo();
> > >         }},
> > >     B,
> > >     C;
> > >
> > >     protected void foo(){
> > >
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > > it throws the following Exception:
> > >
> > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> > >
> > > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > > preserving the folder structure:
> > >
> > > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > > done
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > > >>>> also
> > > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > > >>>> relying
> > > >>>> on
> > > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > > >>>> file
> > > >>>> from the root folder.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > > >>> are
> > > >>> in the path?
> > > >>
> > > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > > >> or if
> > > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > > >> the
> > > >> problem stems from this.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Doru
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > > >
> > > > nicolas
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > www.tudorgirba.com
> > >
> > > "When people care, great things can happen."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "One cannot do more than one can do."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Relationships are of two kinds: those we choose and those that happen. They both matter."






_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Nicolas Anquetil
In reply to this post by Matthias Junker-2

Hi,

I solved it "fast" because I was on holidays :-)
Time's up, back to work :-(

The first thing you could look at is whether it collects correctly all the files to parse:

- in verveine.extractor.java/src/fr/inria/verveine/extrcator/java/VerveineJParser.java
[Eclipse: project verveine.extractor.java ; package fr.inria.verveine.extrcator.java ]

method
    private void collectJavaFiles(Collection<String> paths, Collection<String> files) {
        for (String p : paths) {
            collectJavaFiles(new File(p), files);
        }
    }
look at the values in 'files' in the end.

If this is correct,
Then you can look inFamixRequestor, the class  that prints the name of the parsed files and calls the Verveine visitor
if it is not called for your other subproject, then the problem might be in JDT itself :-(

nicolas


De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 22:51:37
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem

However i just realized my second problem still exists. It still only parses two of the four subprojects now and stops then without exception. i tried what doru suggested but that didn't help, so the .project files were not the problem. i will try to debug a bit in order to find out what the problem is.

Cheers
Matt

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Matthias Junker <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hey,
i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast. 

Cheers
Matt


On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Cool :). What was the problem?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> > OK
> >
> > I think I got it ...
> > It is in the tests and it is green
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> >
> > Hey,
> > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> >
> > public enum TestEnum {
> >
> >     A{
> >         @Override
> >         protected void foo() {
> >             super.foo();
> >         }},
> >     B,
> >     C;
> >
> >     protected void foo(){
> >
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > it throws the following Exception:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > preserving the folder structure:
> >
> > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > done
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > >>>> relying
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > >>>> file
> > >>>> from the root folder.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > >>>
> > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > >>> are
> > >>> in the path?
> > >>
> > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > >> or if
> > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > >> the
> > >> problem stems from this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "When people care, great things can happen."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Matthias Junker-2
Hey,
just tried that. The files are collected properly. However it seems i get a compilation error in one class which obviously stops the parsing. So this doesn't really have to do anything with the subprojects. 

I couldn't find out yet why it stops since in intellij the project compiles without problems. Will try to find out more.

Thanks for your help.
Cheers Matt

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I solved it "fast" because I was on holidays :-)
Time's up, back to work :-(

The first thing you could look at is whether it collects correctly all the files to parse:

- in verveine.extractor.java/src/fr/inria/verveine/extrcator/java/VerveineJParser.java
[Eclipse: project verveine.extractor.java ; package fr.inria.verveine.extrcator.java ]

method
    private void collectJavaFiles(Collection<String> paths, Collection<String> files) {
        for (String p : paths) {
            collectJavaFiles(new File(p), files);
        }
    }
look at the values in 'files' in the end.

If this is correct,
Then you can look inFamixRequestor, the class  that prints the name of the parsed files and calls the Verveine visitor
if it is not called for your other subproject, then the problem might be in JDT itself :-(

nicolas


De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 22:51:37

Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem

However i just realized my second problem still exists. It still only parses two of the four subprojects now and stops then without exception. i tried what doru suggested but that didn't help, so the .project files were not the problem. i will try to debug a bit in order to find out what the problem is.

Cheers
Matt

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Matthias Junker <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hey,
i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast. 

Cheers
Matt


On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Cool :). What was the problem?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> > OK
> >
> > I think I got it ...
> > It is in the tests and it is green
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> >
> > Hey,
> > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> >
> > public enum TestEnum {
> >
> >     A{
> >         @Override
> >         protected void foo() {
> >             super.foo();
> >         }},
> >     B,
> >     C;
> >
> >     protected void foo(){
> >
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > it throws the following Exception:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > preserving the folder structure:
> >
> > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > done
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > >>>> relying
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > >>>> file
> > >>>> from the root folder.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > >>>
> > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > >>> are
> > >>> in the path?
> > >>
> > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > >> or if
> > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > >> the
> > >> problem stems from this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "When people care, great things can happen."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Nicolas Anquetil

thanks for looking into it

It seems it is a problem with JDT parser.
You can get the sources (or I can send them to you) to pin-point the problem

nicolas


De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
Envoyé: Lundi 2 Mai 2011 10:25:14
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem

Hey,
just tried that. The files are collected properly. However it seems i get a compilation error in one class which obviously stops the parsing. So this doesn't really have to do anything with the subprojects. 

I couldn't find out yet why it stops since in intellij the project compiles without problems. Will try to find out more.

Thanks for your help.
Cheers Matt

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I solved it "fast" because I was on holidays :-)
Time's up, back to work :-(

The first thing you could look at is whether it collects correctly all the files to parse:

- in verveine.extractor.java/src/fr/inria/verveine/extrcator/java/VerveineJParser.java
[Eclipse: project verveine.extractor.java ; package fr.inria.verveine.extrcator.java ]

method
    private void collectJavaFiles(Collection<String> paths, Collection<String> files) {
        for (String p : paths) {
            collectJavaFiles(new File(p), files);
        }
    }
look at the values in 'files' in the end.

If this is correct,
Then you can look inFamixRequestor, the class  that prints the name of the parsed files and calls the Verveine visitor
if it is not called for your other subproject, then the problem might be in JDT itself :-(

nicolas


De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 22:51:37

Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem

However i just realized my second problem still exists. It still only parses two of the four subprojects now and stops then without exception. i tried what doru suggested but that didn't help, so the .project files were not the problem. i will try to debug a bit in order to find out what the problem is.

Cheers
Matt

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Matthias Junker <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hey,
i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast. 

Cheers
Matt


On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:

basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Cool :). What was the problem?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> > OK
> >
> > I think I got it ...
> > It is in the tests and it is green
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> >
> > Hey,
> > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> >
> > public enum TestEnum {
> >
> >     A{
> >         @Override
> >         protected void foo() {
> >             super.foo();
> >         }},
> >     B,
> >     C;
> >
> >     protected void foo(){
> >
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > it throws the following Exception:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> >     at
> >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> >     at
> >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > preserving the folder structure:
> >
> > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > done
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > >>>> relying
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > >>>> file
> > >>>> from the root folder.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > >>>
> > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > >>> are
> > >>> in the path?
> > >>
> > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > >> or if
> > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > >> the
> > >> problem stems from this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "When people care, great things can happen."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VerveineJ problem

Tudor Girba
Thanks a lot to both of you for working on this.

Cheers,
Doru


On 2 May 2011, at 10:32, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:

>
> thanks for looking into it
>
> It seems it is a problem with JDT parser.
> You can get the sources (or I can send them to you) to pin-point the problem
>
> nicolas
>
> De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Lundi 2 Mai 2011 10:25:14
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
>
> Hey,
> just tried that. The files are collected properly. However it seems i get a compilation error in one class which obviously stops the parsing. So this doesn't really have to do anything with the subprojects.
>
> I couldn't find out yet why it stops since in intellij the project compiles without problems. Will try to find out more.
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Cheers Matt
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I solved it "fast" because I was on holidays :-)
> Time's up, back to work :-(
>
> The first thing you could look at is whether it collects correctly all the files to parse:
>
> - in verveine.extractor.java/src/fr/inria/verveine/extrcator/java/VerveineJParser.java
> [Eclipse: project verveine.extractor.java ; package fr.inria.verveine.extrcator.java ]
>
> method
>     private void collectJavaFiles(Collection<String> paths, Collection<String> files) {
>         for (String p : paths) {
>             collectJavaFiles(new File(p), files);
>         }
>     }
> look at the values in 'files' in the end.
>
> If this is correct,
> Then you can look inFamixRequestor, the class  that prints the name of the parsed files and calls the Verveine visitor
> if it is not called for your other subproject, then the problem might be in JDT itself :-(
>
> nicolas
>
> De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 22:51:37
>
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
>
> However i just realized my second problem still exists. It still only parses two of the four subprojects now and stops then without exception. i tried what doru suggested but that didn't help, so the .project files were not the problem. i will try to debug a bit in order to find out what the problem is.
>
> Cheers
> Matt
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Matthias Junker <[hidden email]>wrote:
> Hey,
> i tried again and it works now. Thanks a lot for solving this so fast.
>
> Cheers
> Matt
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]>wrote:
>
> basically the problem was that I did not anticipate a complex construct like that :-)
>
> nicolas
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> > De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Mai 2011 21:21:34
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > Cool :). What was the problem?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On 1 May 2011, at 21:14, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> >
> > > OK
> > >
> > > I think I got it ...
> > > It is in the tests and it is green
> > >
> > > nicolas
> > >
> > > De: "Matthias Junker" <[hidden email]>
> > > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > > Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 19:20:58
> > > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > >
> > > Hey,
> > > Will try this. I tried to parse the subprojects individually in the
> > > meantime and found another exception when parsing enums which
> > > override a method in an enum constant. Try parsing the following:
> > >
> > > public enum TestEnum {
> > >
> > >     A{
> > >         @Override
> > >         protected void foo() {
> > >             super.foo();
> > >         }},
> > >     B,
> > >     C;
> > >
> > >     protected void foo(){
> > >
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > > it throws the following Exception:
> > >
> > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Enum cannot be cast to
> > > fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Class
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(VerveineVisitor.java:510)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperMethodInvocation.accept0(SuperMethodInvocation.java:237)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept0(AnonymousClassDeclaration.java:143)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumConstantDeclaration.accept0(EnumConstantDeclaration.java:260)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.EnumDeclaration.accept0(EnumDeclaration.java:280)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
> > >     at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(FamixRequestor.java:31)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
> > >     at
> > >     org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(VerveineJParser.java:169)
> > >     at
> > >     fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(VerveineJParser.java:153)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Nicolas, thanks for the clarification.
> > >
> > > Matthias, could you try copying all the java files to a new folder?
> > > For convenience, here is a bash script that would copy all files
> > > preserving the folder structure:
> > >
> > > for file in $(find . -name '*.java'); do mkdir -p
> > > NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file); cp $file NEWFOLDER/$(dirname $file);
> > > done
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Doru
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:49, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>> ----- Mail original -----
> > > >>>> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> > > >>>> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> > > >>>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2011 09:46:15
> > > >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: VerveineJ problem
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I had a similar problem before with the new inFusion which is
> > > >>>> also
> > > >>>> based on JDT. In that case, the problem was due to inFusion
> > > >>>> relying
> > > >>>> on
> > > >>>> an Eclipse project and it got confused because of the .project
> > > >>>> file
> > > >>>> from the root folder.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Nicolas, would VerveineJ not be affected by a .project?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You mean a .project that would not reference all the source that
> > > >>> are
> > > >>> in the path?
> > > >>
> > > >> I am just asking whether VerveineJ takes .project into account,
> > > >> or if
> > > >> it always traverses deep all the sources starting from the root
> > > >> folder. If it does consider a possible .project, it could be that
> > > >> the
> > > >> problem stems from this.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Doru
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No it dsoes not use .project afaik.
> > > > It looks for all the java files in the directory(ies) it is given
> > > >
> > > > nicolas
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > www.tudorgirba.com
> > >
> > > "When people care, great things can happen."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Moose-dev mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "One cannot do more than one can do."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
12